Forum Replies Created

Page 181 of 245
  • The question is what you need and what you want to spend.

    When thinking about a new Media 100 hardware the question is if you want to have the option to work in HD or not. For us luckily the tools always created opportunities. Quickly after we got our first HD system we got a request for a HD production. When we bought our first HD system we had not a real need for a HD solution, but the fact taht we had the possibility to work in HD gave us access to this job and some more that followed it. So I would vote for one of the HD solutions; probably for the HDe system if you don

  • Floh Peters

    August 4, 2006 at 6:04 pm in reply to: transcode Media 100 codec

    If you are working on a Mac, download the Media 100 codec from here. These codec can read and write Media 100 files.

  • Floh Peters

    August 2, 2006 at 12:25 pm in reply to: M100HD Setup on SDI

    [markmoon] “As you know there should be NO setup on serial video.. Black fro the deck should be 0 ire.. not 7.5 ire Media 100 is introducing it .. and there is no way around it..”

    Two questions: if you are measuring your SDI out from the deck directly via SDI, and then through the Media 100 system (SDI in and out), is there a difference?
    And if you digitize black in Media 100 into the Media 100 i codec and open the resulting clip in AfterEffects, does the clips RGB 8bit values read as 16,16,16? If yes, then the setup probably is added on output…

    Floh

  • Floh Peters

    August 2, 2006 at 11:07 am in reply to: M100HD Setup on SDI

    Luckily we work only with PAL footage so we don

  • Floh Peters

    August 1, 2006 at 2:24 pm in reply to: interlacing headache

    [Tugs M. MacCow] “A question. You said that footage should be interpreted in AE as top field first. Yet in the de-interlacing tutorial (De-Interlacing the Cow), Barend states that DV footage is lower field dominant. Which of you is correct?”

    Both. Native DV PAL footage is lower field first, PAL Media 100 files are upper field first (and do get interpreted correctly in AE automatically)

    [Tugs M. MacCow] “Another headache which you may or may not have insight into. I’ve tried rendering a test in AE with field rendering off as you’ve suggested and when I try to encode it in BitVice, as soon as I’ve specified the source file (i.e. even before I hit the Encode button), BitVice crahses. I’ve never had problems with BitVice before. Does this ring any bells? Thanks once again.”

    This should not happen. Maybe a bad render file? I would try rendering again.

  • Floh Peters

    July 31, 2006 at 8:35 pm in reply to: interlacing headache

    [Tugs M. MacCow] “Here’s the problem. When I play the edited commercial back in M100 it looks lovely. But however I export it, the entire film suffers from nasty interlacing artefacts whenever there’s significant horizontal motion. Interestingly this occurs for both the straight and After Effects shots.
    I should point out that the After Effects shots were used with the Separate Fields setting turned off in the Interpret Footage window.”

    The question is how you watch the clips. Everything that is interlaced will look fine on a video monitor (as long as the field order is correct) but will look bad on a computer screen, since it is displayed progressive there.
    If you render an interlaced image through AE interpreted as straight and you don

  • Floh Peters

    July 29, 2006 at 12:01 pm in reply to: Are Media100 7.5(OS9) and 8.2.2(OSX) compatible?

    [Ajmetz] “It mentions “Media 100i is now compatible with Media 100 HD and Media 100 sw. This allows you to seamlessly move media between systems.””

    It is not possible to open timelines from sw or HD in Media 100 i. You only can export self-contained clips from sw and import them into Media 100 i for mastering.

    [Ajmetz] “- Upgrade 8.2.2 to 8.2.3a (free!?)” Yes.
    [Ajmetz] “- Get Media100sw for the second person/freelancer. (Free for 90 days)” I

  • Floh Peters

    July 28, 2006 at 7:09 am in reply to: Are Media100 7.5(OS9) and 8.2.2(OSX) compatible?

    [Ajmetz] “Are Media100 7.5(OS9) and 8.2.2(OSX) compatible?
    Or is it like Media100sw where once you’ve saved it in the newer program, it can’t be opened by the older program?”

    Older versions never could open files from newer versions. V8.2 e.g. has (up to) 24 audio tracks and unlimited graphics tracks which were not supported by V7.5.

  • Floh Peters

    July 27, 2006 at 5:51 pm in reply to: goodbye final cut, hello m100… (again)

    [Michael Slowe] “Can I ask you whether you are certain that version 11.5 (or even 11) will allow real time viewing of dissolves and opacity when editing in un compressed HD because my re seller in London was not as certain as you appeared to be in one of your recent posts.”

    Update: As I thought, HD Clips on the V1-V99 tracks with opacity breakpoints also play back in realtime over the backg video on V11 on the old hardware.

  • Floh Peters

    July 27, 2006 at 10:20 am in reply to: goodbye final cut, hello m100… (again)

    [Michael Slowe] “Bobby and Floh, are we talking at cross purposes here? In upgrading to a version 11 I hope to be keeping the card and hardware that I currently have with my version 10. Are you answering the question about unrendered realtime dissolves etc. thinking that the new card will be in place?”

    Michael,

    we

Page 181 of 245

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy