David Powell
Forum Replies Created
-
Thanks charlie. It sound like you’re speaking of a clip by clip basis. I’m basically taking a long 3-4 hour multi cam sequence (project) and extracting what I dont like, leaving the selects there. You seem to be describing the process the other way around, but the problem is, I really have to make my selections based on what I’m cutting out more than what I’m leaving. So I guess the short answer is there is no persistent i/o in a project. Kinda baffling why the whole range selection was created. I’ve been using X for 6 months straight now, and I’ve seen no upside to it thus far.
Do you know offhand if there is a “mark to markers” command like in 7? That would essentially function as i/o’s for me in a project.
-
That being said, if a mixdown master can happen in the bg, that would still make it usable for me, and opens up more possibility of Ditching X for this kind of work.
-
I also wonder if anything was axed to make the package cheaper like Avid FX. MC 5 came with Boris CC and that was axed in 6. Avid FX is the only secondary color grading solution available. I would’ve like have seen updated color controls and a multi-cam solution for start/stop camera that doesn’t involve Reality TV style multi-grouping. Of course if a ref file could be imported via AMA that would fix that problem.
-
I just took the test last saturday. You do not need to take a class. You do have to take the test from an authorized avid test center, and they will charge you around $150 to take the test. Its free if you pay for the cla$$ though.
There are 2 books that cover the User cert and two additional that cover the pro cert. You can take either or.
-
I was brainstorming out an idea but looking back at marcus’ post, it wasn’t the right way to go about it.
-
David Powell
March 30, 2013 at 6:43 am in reply to: What are the primary “gotchas” in PP CS6 coming from MC/Legacy?Agreed. I remember having to cut a show on 7 after having spent the last year cutting exclusively on MC and thinking how cumbersome the track selection was. Of course all the time I spent cutting on 7 before Avid I never noticed.
My hope is that PP develops closer to the Avid timeline and not to 7s.
-
David Powell
March 30, 2013 at 5:53 am in reply to: What are the primary “gotchas” in PP CS6 coming from MC/Legacy?Avid has a toggled auto-patch function that makes it much less work to patch than FCP 7. Without the auto-patch enabled though, I can see how this would start to be a chore. Guess I’ll have to get used to it and cross my fingers that the complaints got through for the next installment of PP.
-
David Powell
March 30, 2013 at 12:21 am in reply to: What are the primary “gotchas” in PP CS6 coming from MC/Legacy?I was thinking the same thing regarding the video being for 5.5 but it seems most of the functions are still the same. Anyone know any differently?
-
David Powell
March 29, 2013 at 2:28 pm in reply to: What are the primary “gotchas” in PP CS6 coming from MC/Legacy?Thanks Bob! How funny, the “biggest gotcha” is standard track selection form in Avid, so what drives Walter “batty” is exactly what I’ve come to expect.
-
I’ve been having the same trouble with h.264. I did a test last week as another attempt to solve the problem and found that clips longer than 10 minutes always gave an error, yet I could transcodea large number of smaller clips.
They all should eventually transcode but for longer clips, they have to be babysat. and you shouldn’t transcode more than 3 long clips at a time.