David Olsen
Forum Replies Created
-
I gave this a shot, the output was good — no artifacting to speak of, but I still ended up with a ghost image if I paused and framed through the video. I think since this material is telecined, I’m thinking that inverse telecining might be what works best.
-
Sorry, misunderstood your question. Yes, this is telecined material.
-
Thanks for the replies guys, I’ll run some tests and let ya know what I decide!
-
40:27 (720 x 486). Pulled from digibeta.
I’m looking for best image quality without deleted fields.
-
I’ve tried even (bottom), odd (top), and none (progressive) — even (bottom) is what it’s supposed to take, but gives me the problem I have currently… odd results in a very shakey picture… and progressive makes the image flicker on the (B?) frames.
-
We have material that doesn’t exhibit this problem — and when watching it on the monitors we have, the interlacing isn’t visible. (so when watching movement, you don’t see the scanlines – even just framing through it, you won’t see the scanlines)
BUT, the material that DOES exhibit the problem shows visible interlacing on the monitor (you can see the scanlines during movement).
-
BTW: We had the disc professionally QC’d – and they described the problem as being the result of disparate interlaced frames.
-
Thanks for the insight! I think it was the fact that the drive was nearly full. We capture in batches of 4-5 episodes (nearly the full drive), so I cleared the scratch drive and tried capturing just that one episode, and it worked out!
Problem solved.
-
Also, to elaborate, only certain segments come up with the problem. So for example, the Digibeta might have 4 episodes on it, but only the 3rd episode comes up with dropped frames.
-
Hmmm – didn’t work 🙁