David Cherniack
Forum Replies Created
-
In terms of costs the dual xeon DDR4 ECC ram is prohibitively expensive at the moment and a non-ECC X99 system is much better value. BTW you can drop a Xeon into the X99’s socket and I don’t think it will require ECC ram.
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
[Robert d'Alexis] “Actually, my ‘can you define that” question ( a nod to a previous post) was my way of asking you to list the machine’s specs.
I am interested to know how the new chipset performs.”Hard to say. it depends on your use. This is an office machine for running all my administrative software. Neverthless with an i7 5820 6/12 core 3.6GHz CPU and 16GB of 4 way DDR4 2133 ram (not overclocked though the ASRock MB is built for it) and running all my background software it’s it’s still 25% faster than my 2010 dual xeon 8/16 heavy iron system rendering out a Lightwave 3D scene ( non-GPU ) and 90% faster than the late 2013 MBP under Bootcamp – both with no other processes running.
So for me it’s very fast and I’m now contemplating a new dual Xeon system based on the equivalent C612 dual Xeon chipset. https://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/6866/asus-z10pe-d8-ws-dual-cpu-intel-c612-workstation-motherboard-review/index2.html
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
[Robert d'Alexis] “[David Cherniack] “…on a brand new X99 chipset screamer”
Can you define that? :-)”
The simplest definition is by negation: I’m not on an Apple hardware cycle of waiting 3-4 years for a new generation of machines only to find that they may require a whole new investment in peripherals, be inadequate to my needs, and/or destructive to my wallet.
But here’s an Anandtech description of the platform https://www.anandtech.com/show/8557/x99-motherboard-roundup-asus-x99-deluxe-gigabyte-x99-ud7-ud5-asrock-x99-ws-msi-x99s-sli-plus-intel-haswell-e. Probably make a fine Hackintosh, if one had the need.
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
[Charlie Austin] “Can you define that?”
Sorry, no. It’s rather a big subject and I really don’t have the time being busy as I am installing all the variety of Windows software I use on a daily basis on a brand new X99 chipset screamer. Besides anyone who moves freely back and forth between different computer ecosystems understands what I mean: Apple makes simplified software interfaces by limiting initial choices. That doesn’t mean the software is necessarily less functional, once you dive beneath the surface. But the surface can be a matter of taste. FYI I have a late 2013 RMBP in my arsenal, a fine machine.
-
[Charlie Austin] ” know huh? I’ve been cutting in Pr quite a bit lately. It is a fine, capable, full featured NLE. And working in it sucks the life out of me”
I know exactly what you mean, Charlie. If I had to work in FCPX all day I would feel like the Apple Way of Doing Things had drained every last breath of creative methodology from my very soul. 🙂 The interface alone would have had me comatose within hours. It’s great thing there’s choice in this wonderful world 🙂
All Best,
David -
As a somewaht sane person I use enterprise class drives. I have 10 3TB Seagate Constellation ES drives in a Raid 6. So far not a burp from the Areca controller.
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
David Cherniack
January 13, 2015 at 3:53 pm in reply to: The exponential greatness of multicam in FCPX[Scott Witthaus] ” Apple did something very right with this software.”
I’ll stay in the subjective mode and say, I think that depends on how one values what they did. For me, it’s not so much. My mileage doth definitely vary.
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
David Cherniack
January 13, 2015 at 3:06 am in reply to: The exponential greatness of multicam in FCPX“I agree with you James. I like the term “elegant” over simple. Others mileage may vary.”
I like the term “simplistic” over both so you’re right Mileage Does Vary. I’m not being confrontational here. I really disliked the interface. It felt designed for simplicity at the expense of functionality. I’m sure that’s only intended not to scare off new editors but it pushed all my “inelegance” buttons.
-
David Cherniack
December 27, 2014 at 11:56 am in reply to: Is it possible for an expression to create separate shape layers from a color map?Does no one have an opinion on whether this is is at all possible? Or perhaps, if possible, would it be just too inefficient?
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com -
Correct me if I’m wrong but his 5.1 output is synthesized from a compound stereo clip? Sure seems so.
David
https://AllinOneFilms.com