Forum Replies Created

Page 9 of 215
  • Daniel Low

    May 25, 2010 at 3:49 pm in reply to: Canon 550D – render way

    [Emil Niemi] “Now i just don’t now what’s wrong, and what i actually are needing to do? I need convert my file to something else, because what i understand Sony Vegas not like .mov files or so?”

    What do you want to end up with? What do you want to do with the video file in the end?

    The Canon produces a Quicktime H.264 .mov. It couldn’t be much simpler than that!. If Vegas does not support mov then you need to get something else. You can use MPEGStream clip or Quicktime Pro

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Daniel Low

    May 25, 2010 at 3:46 pm in reply to: Canon 550D – render way

    [Emil Niemi] “Now i just don’t now what’s wrong, and what i actually are needing to do? I need convert my file to something else, because what i understand Sony Vegas not like .mov files or so?”

    What do you want to end up with? What do you want to do with the video file in the end?

    The Canon produces a Quicktime H.264 .mov. It couldn’t be much simpler than that!. If Vegas does not support mov then you need to get something else. Why not just upgrade to Quicktime Pro and convert using that?

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Daniel Low

    May 25, 2010 at 3:29 pm in reply to: Adobe Media Encoder FLV and odd ratios

    I guess AME just doesn’t support that resolution.

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Daniel Low

    May 24, 2010 at 3:28 pm in reply to: The text comes out very liney.

    https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/20/862073

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Yes they do.

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Daniel Low

    May 22, 2010 at 8:20 am in reply to: WebM Article, can anyone comment on this?

    That Google post was from https://kara.allthingsd.com/20100521/viral-video-googles-laughable-but-not-funny-apple-tantrum/?mod=ATD_rss

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Daniel Low

    May 22, 2010 at 8:09 am in reply to: WebM Article, can anyone comment on this?

    [Chris Blair] “I don’t really have an opinion”

    You could have fooled me!

    [Chris Blair] “Also, you don’t know my friend (he’s a multi-millionaire with a legion of successful companies he’s built, bought and revived, and bought and sold) so I don’t think you’re in a position to judge him. Second, I’ve won Emmy awards, have owned and operated my own company for 14 years and have scores of loyal clients…so you have no business judging me. “

    I wasn’t judging you, I used the word ‘if’. (“Your old friend is a total loser (and so are you) if he thinks that ‘Good enough’ wins over ‘great'”.)

    I still don’t get your point. By what you’ve written, you are stating that you have won Emmys and have a successful business by being ‘just good enough’.

    [Chris Blair] “WebM supports HTML5. “

    Wrong. That’s like saying that H.264 supports Flash. What you should have said is HTML5 supports WebM. – If you’d done your homework you’d know that WebM is a container format. Like AVI or MXF.

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Daniel Low

    May 21, 2010 at 11:48 pm in reply to: WebM Article, can anyone comment on this?

    “Now that Google has been booted from the Apple boardroom – it’s funny that their only playbook is MS. How MANY businesses are Google in that make NO money? Chrome? Android? Google TV? YouTube? Google music “store,” Google’s closed “video” store … Google like MS is a one trick pony and the tactics that took down MS (free everything) simply do NOT work with Apple because unlike MS users who tolerated the products and were anxious to switch to ANY competitor that was slightly better, Apple is no MS or yahoo. The Google photo of 10 pasty (er, white guys) old dudes sitting on stage was so MS and so sadly hilarious. I think it’s safe to say for Google it’s all downhill from here. While ALL of Google’s revenue hinges on the hope taht no one knocks them off their search perch (97% revenue from ads), Apple meanwhile in 11 years has built FIVE Multi-billion dollar business units from ZERO – ipod, iphone, ipad (crssing billion anyday now), itunes, and retail … add in the Mac, you have six … how many billion dollar business units at google outside of search? Office apps? YouTube? Chrome? android? all free or nearly free giveaways … so Google better be sure no one sneaks up on them on search while they are trying to be Apple … they are hopelessly outclassed and outgunned there. What’s next, a google retail store?”

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Daniel Low

    May 21, 2010 at 11:10 pm in reply to: Android Compression

    https://www.smor.tv/blog/android-htc-hero-eris-x264-h-264-video-encoding-with-handbrake/

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

  • Daniel Low

    May 21, 2010 at 11:04 pm in reply to: WebM Article, can anyone comment on this?

    Always, Chris, always….

    [Chris Blair] “Considering they have Chrome, Firefox, and Opera browsers plus Google & YouTube all behind them, along with launch partners like Skype, Nvidia, Qualcomm, AMD, ARM, Brightcove, Encoding.com, Kaltura, and HD Cloud, I’d have to say they have some considerable clout in their camp.

    Considerable but missing the two biggest market leaders and influencers: Apple and Microsoft. After all, the reason Google has done this is because of Apple!

    In the end, I’m not sure what your point is Chris, I can’t tell whether you are behind the new format or not.

    Ultimately people want high quality products that work with the minimum of fuss without chewing up batteries or bandwidth. As such, in this instance, WebM is not the answer. HTML5 with H.264 is.

    [Chris Blair] “As a wise old business friend of mine has told me over the years, the vast majority of consumers want “good enough.” And while that’s certainly not a particularly inspiring lesson to preach to a business owner or innovator, more often than not, “good enough” wins out over “great” when it comes to market share. “

    What do you think the technological landscape would be like if Steve Jobs took your wise old friends attitude?

    There’d be no GUI
    No mouse
    No Pixar
    No iPod
    No iPhone
    No iPad.
    From Apple being worth nothing a decade ago to now being with 4 x more than Dell and selling more phones than Motorola.

    All of the above excel. None of the above were just ‘good enough’.

    Your old friend is a total loser (and so are you) if he thinks that ‘Good enough’ wins over ‘great’.

    All that said, I don’t see what your point is apart from trolling.

    VP8 is a step back from H.264.

    The real point here is about HTML5 vs Flash and which can offer a better experience on a broader range of devices.

    Not just throwing in the towel and saying I can’t be bothered anymore ’cause that’s good enough!

    But considering where you are in the world, nothing you say surprises me in the slightest!

    __________________________________________________________________
    Sent from my iPad Nano.

Page 9 of 215

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy