Forum Replies Created

Page 181 of 215
  • Daniel Low

    February 27, 2008 at 5:14 pm in reply to: batch processing MainConcept Reference!

    What version are you running? – Version 1.1.1 is the latest.

  • Daniel Low

    February 27, 2008 at 4:43 pm in reply to: VP6 Squeeze makes better video than FlixOn2Vp6 ?

    It’s unlikely that you are using the exact same settings, as both applications don’t have the exact same feature set.
    Bottom line us that Squeeze is a better transcoding application than Flix, although the codec implementation is probably exactly the same.

    Forget Silverlight, if you can’t get Flash to work well at low-bandwidths then you’ll be even worse off with that Windows technology. (IMHO Silverlight is going nowhere).

    There’s no such thing as ‘Flash Turbo’ AFAIK.

  • Daniel Low

    February 26, 2008 at 4:26 pm in reply to: 720×405 Why?

    For viewing on a (Widescreen) TV you should be delivering 720×576 non-square.

  • Daniel Low

    February 26, 2008 at 1:56 pm in reply to: uncompressed to web

    Why do a seperate resize and export out of Quicktime player when you could complete the entire process in Compressor and end up with better quality?

  • Daniel Low

    February 26, 2008 at 1:06 pm in reply to: uncompressed to web

    There are a bunch of options you could choose from including WMV and H.264.

    It depends on who your audience are and how you want the video viewed.

  • Daniel Low

    February 26, 2008 at 1:03 pm in reply to: 720×405 Why?

    Then you could give him 1024×576 square pixels, or 720×576 non-square or 720×405 square pixels.

    It all depends on what your client wants to do with the material?

  • Daniel Low

    February 26, 2008 at 10:39 am in reply to: 720×405 Why?

    Ok, but 720×405 is not a PAL resolution. Where did the clip(s) come from?

  • Daniel Low

    February 25, 2008 at 7:37 pm in reply to: 720×405 Why?

    720×405 is 16:9 square pixel:

    16/9 = 1.78 (1.7777777777778)

    720/405 = 1.78

    405×1.78 = 720.9

    720/1.78 = 404.9

    What or where is your source from?

    Generally speaking, are you working in PAL or NTSC?

    What are you delivering to?

  • Daniel Low

    February 25, 2008 at 6:48 pm in reply to: swf converted to quicktime or flv ?

    https://www.techspansion.com/visualhub/

    Should do the job and it’s cheap!

  • Daniel Low

    February 25, 2008 at 8:36 am in reply to: swf converted to quicktime or flv ?

    Yes it can.

    It’ll look pretty horrible in most cases.

    There are a number of ways of doing it depending on your OS.

Page 181 of 215

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy