Forum Replies Created

Page 63 of 282
  • [Craig Seeman] “Least we forget there’s another related branch because the Cable services are also major Internet Service Providers and there’s still some flux in the economics around that.

    A key point that is almost always forgotten in the face-value version of this discussion.

  • [Bill Davis] “Agree or disagree”

    Frankly, I think it sounds more desperate than prophetic.

  • [Andrew Kimery] “Hulu, Neflix and even Amazon w/it’s streaming service are in better positions to expand delivery away from traditional outlets than YT, IMO.”

    Agreed.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 2, 2013 at 8:40 pm in reply to: Video not frame accurate when audio scrubbing

    I’m still on 6, but I’m not having this problem either.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 1, 2013 at 11:54 pm in reply to: AE drives the NLE decision

    [David Lawrence] “[Jeremy Garchow] “I just don’t see this as news that Adobe After Effects, Photoshop, and Illustrator are being taught to students and students are using them to get high quality work done.

    Hasn’t it been this way for some time now?

    Out of all the video tools I’ve used, After Effects is the one I’ve been using the longest.”

    Oh, I completely agree. I think the point is now that Premiere has received major enhancements — many in direct response to FCP Legacy user requests — it’s now poised to join them in the NLE space.

    Its funny. This statement makes me reflect on all the different directions we come from. When I think about what video tool I’ve used the longest, across all of the NLEs going back to linear, I can’t escape the fact that one single program–MS Word–connects them all. I’m a writer who became a producer who became an editor. Photoshop would probably be second. “Farph!,” you say. “Word ain’t no video tool.” But, I beg to differ.

    And, yes–this is just an aside. I am in no way arguing that choice of Word Processor will dictate choice of NLE.

  • Hey, maybe next year. I’d never been to the super-meet before; but I figured after the 2011 Hullabaloo that I’d check it out. It was fun.

  • Thanks, Bill. I was skipping through the threads so I’m not sure I understood the context of the question. I was questioning Atilio’s five step Avid process in answer to Dan. Now, I see. Yes, if you wanted to use Avid in a searchable manner similar to X, it would take two extra steps. But as you so aptly point out, it would not be my preferred way of working.

    Hey! I believe I saw you on the stage of the supermeet–if that was you calling out numbers–though I didn’t know it at the time. I had fun. Its quite a show you guys put on. I wish that every show I go to would toss out that many prizes at its audience!

  • In Avid, why would you bother breaking down a single piece of video, making sub clips and then renaming them? I just drop them into timeline–3 keystrokes–and then use the timeline as a bin. I guess I’m missing something.

  • Chris Harlan

    April 29, 2013 at 5:42 am in reply to: What will Apple do with the Macintosh?

    Marcus, just so I’m clear, I DO agree with you that it would make sense for Apple to release a Mac Pro. If I HAD to bet, I would guess that they will. But, there are also a ton of reasons why they might not. It is certainly nothing that I would pin my hopes on. It would be nice, however, if it happens.

  • Chris Harlan

    April 29, 2013 at 1:25 am in reply to: What will Apple do with the Macintosh?

    [Marcus Moore] “He said a new MacPro was coming out “later next year [2013]; that’s light on details, but it’s not cryptic.

    I see it as a vague blow-off, not a promise. But, hey, shine on you crazy diamond.

Page 63 of 282

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy