Forum Replies Created

Page 61 of 282
  • Chris Harlan

    May 7, 2013 at 2:50 am in reply to: Premiere Pro CC it is then?

    [Herb Sevush] “I just need to edit video efficiently.

    I hear ya. It can’t be more than once a year, and maybe less, that I’m bummed that I don’t have access to the CS items beyond what is in production bundle. So, yes; getting access to the master bundle is sort of ho-hum for me.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 7, 2013 at 2:44 am in reply to: Premiere Pro CC it is then?

    [Franz Bieberkopf] “[Bret Williams] “No guarantees beyond the immediate present.”

    Bret,

    So you aren’t interested in films, pictures, recordings or any other media from the past? Or you’re satisfied with limited access to them?

    Perhaps that is the prevailing wind. It’s a fascinating thought.

    Franz.

    I guess for me the reality is that I just don’t go back to projects that often. I do use back-up copies with splits a lot, though. In fact, quite a bit. Maybe it is because I’ve hopped from and between so many incompatible NLEs over the years, and I’ve had to provide so much source material to others on those incompatible NLEs, that I’ve gotten used to it. And, I can make folders of media managed material with an AFF or XML list to take them somewhere else.

    I don’t like the decision Adobe has made here, but mostly because I don’t like the way it seems to affect others. I, myself, am not feeling much of an upset. It may be that, after two years, I’m just upset-out.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 7, 2013 at 2:25 am in reply to: Premiere Pro CC: The bright side

    [Herb Sevush] “Or you could have your settings on a thumb drive and load them into any computer you want without a CC subscription or internet connection of any sort. What’s the big deal?”

    Just so 2012, Herb. What R U thinking?

    FWIW, I like the idea, too. Plus, I can park a lot of my commonly used files, like SFX packages, in that little online closet that comes along with membership. No, it doesn’t rock the foundation of NLEville, but its a fun fact.

  • It doesn’t make much difference to me. I’ll continue to keep one foot in Premiere and the other in Media Composer. And, of course FCP 7 for those who still want me to use it.

    My biggest concern is that this move will slow or stop the adoption of Premiere in my end of the industry. That would be sad, because I think it is really well suited to replace Legacy. Also, while I like to use Media Composer and Premiere about the same, I think the next version of Premiere will put me squarely in the Premiere camp for my personal use.

    Overall, it would just be a bummer if this decision derailed Premiere. But, for me personally; no, it will not make me consider X, and generally, not change my plans at all.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 6, 2013 at 11:22 pm in reply to: Premiere Pro CC it is then?

    [Dan Stewart] “As I understand it CS6 will continue to be on sale but will not be supported.”

    Actually, it will be supported, just not upgraded.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 6, 2013 at 10:18 pm in reply to: Premiere Pro CC it is then?

    [David Lawrence] “[Jeremy Garchow] “It’s not about the money, but it’s about the money.”

    It’s not about the money. It’s about who controls access to your digital property.

    I do get this. And yet…

    I’m ambivalent. None of us actually owns the software now. We license it. I can see Adobe’s point, as to why to do this. And, I can see value for me in the approach. I wish, for the sake of adoption, it had been less drastic. But maybe in the long run, that’s a good thing too.

    I’m not thrilled about it, but I’m much less pissed about it than I thought I would be.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 6, 2013 at 10:10 pm in reply to: Premiere Pro CC it is then?

    [TImothy Auld] “Praise the Lord.

    Give the Art gods their due. At least they’re not asking for heads. Yet.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 6, 2013 at 9:48 pm in reply to: Premiere Pro CC it is then?

    [Shawn Miller] “enjoying it but I’m also glad I have a copy of CS5.5 to ‘fall back on’.”

    Right! I am definitely holding on to my previous licenses… just in case. 🙂

    Me too. But, I’m not a broken up by all of this as perhaps I should be. Oddly, this reminds me more of the religious practice of tithing, than it does rental.

  • [Alex Hawkins] “[Chris Harlan] “My fourteen year old and I are about to watch Doctor Who, as it plays in its proper time slot because its an event for us”

    Hey Chris majorly OT, but what ep are you up to over there? Is it the same as the ones airing in the UK now?

    Are you a post 2005 fan or were you into the classic series as well?

    The Doctor is never OT. We just saw something set back in the 1890’s at a Wellville-from-Hell establishment with the lizard lady and the potato-headed warrior dude. If my daughter was close at hand, she could tell you the name of the episode, as well as shame me for not knowing the names of the galactic races that the two aforementioned characters belong to.

    Well, when I was a kid I used to be a big fan of the 4th doctor. We got reruns of him of him on weekends, over here on PBS. T’was a blast. And it has been an even greater blast to share Doctors 9-11 with my daughter. I fear the quality is ebbing a bit this season, but the new companion is a sweetie.

  • [Paul Neumann] “The kids are alright.”

    Indeed. My fourteen year old and I are about to watch Doctor Who, as it plays in its proper time slot because its an event for us, then we’ll watch Warehouse 13 as a download from iTunes. Then, she will no doubt retire to join other nerd fighters and watch her favorite youtube podcast by the Vlogbrothers, while I catch up with Game of Thrones, on Demand. Or maybe I’ll pop over to Lynda and do a little Premiere polishing.

    S’all Good, man.

Page 61 of 282

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy