Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 403
  • My go to way of doing this for long form projects is to submit the text file and sound and pay to
    have it captioned….way quicker and not very expensive. I also pay the extra for the result review for 100% accurate results.
    This is the company i use: https://www.automaticsync.com

    For commercials, I caption by hand using the method you described.

  • Chris Borjis

    November 20, 2017 at 7:08 pm in reply to: Why do surround exports get lowered by -3 db?

    [Chris Wright] “you have to manually change the audio mixer yourself”

    Not quite sure I follow…can you elaborate?

    I know I have to manually set things like panning and channel assignments,
    but the channel assignments are locked to 1 & 2 only on a mono audio mixer setup.
    (the option is gone to assign more channels beyond 1 & 2)

    How are you getting around that in the case of a quicktime with embedded surround
    within a set of mono channels sequence?

  • Chris Borjis

    November 20, 2017 at 5:19 pm in reply to: Why do surround exports get lowered by -3 db?

    Thanks Chris, that is exactly what I do/did to get it to go out for blu-ray and dcp
    (mono channels) but for the quicktime export I have to raise the audio mixer +3db
    to get it to export at the right level and keep the channel routing intact.
    Fortunately there is headroom for that and when re-imported the levels and channel
    routing are correct.

    I did hear someone mention something about the “Panning Law” thing before.

    Oddly FCP 7 never seemed to have this problem as you could set
    each channel to 0 (default was -3db on each i think)

    How are you able to export a quicktime though with embedded
    surround using mono channels? You can pan sure, but the channel assignment
    is missing in that setup. My workaround I used was raising the audio mixer
    channels +3db as mentioned in the first paragraph above.

  • Chris Borjis

    November 3, 2017 at 5:26 pm in reply to: How do I show gridlines for FLAT format (1998×1080?)

    as someone who has done MANY DCP’s I can say none of my clients want their
    content zoomed. slight pillarbox on the sides is the way to go.

  • Chris Borjis

    October 20, 2017 at 5:16 pm in reply to: No CUDA with the 9.0 drivers

    I ran into that recently and had to downgrade the driver as you mentioned
    to get CUDA as an option.

  • Chris Borjis

    October 18, 2017 at 8:40 pm in reply to: Adobe CC 2018 apps are now live

    +1
    as clunky as it is, I still rely on it often.

  • Chris Borjis

    October 18, 2017 at 4:18 pm in reply to: Leaping into 4k Having issues

    This is important…how much ram does your NVidia card have?

    What really made 4k editing much smoother for me was
    having a gpu with 4gb of ram. I went from a GTX 670 2gb
    card to a Quadro 5000 with 4gb of ram and now editing
    4k is just as smooth as editing 1080.

    Make sure you are using the latest Nvidia card driver
    and CUDA version.

  • Chris Borjis

    October 18, 2017 at 4:15 pm in reply to: Project File Size Limit?

    One thing that can greatly increase the size is using warp stabilizer.
    Must be storing some of that data in the project file.

    It used to grow project files to immense and almost unstable sizes.
    I know Adobe addressed that issue so it took up less room, but
    if you are stabilizing a lot of shots, that could be contributing to
    the size.

  • Chris Borjis

    October 6, 2017 at 6:34 pm in reply to: Promise editing 4K files

    I noticed a big difference in system response editing 4k red sequences when
    we upgraded from 16gb to 32gb. So ya up that to 32 at least but 48 if you can.

  • since you have Radeon as your GPU I believe OpenCL is your best choice.

    Interesting that Metal is an option.

    Maybe render something with GPU F/x and try both out.

Page 2 of 403

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy