Forum Replies Created

Page 78 of 258
  • [Andrew Kimery] “All the PPro articles about its use on Gone Girl didn’t appear until around the same time the movie hit theaters, right?”

    Correct.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • [TImothy Auld] “Warner Brothers is but a fly on the windshield compared to Apple. To suggest that Warner Brothers controls this conversation is delusional.”

    All due respect, but you have no clue how movie marketing works. There are NDA’s involved. Believe whatever you want though…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • [TImothy Auld] “I’m sorry, but what?”

    Warner Bros. probably does not want Apple to talk about their movie yet. They don’t even have a full trailer out at this point, just a teaser. The marketing campaign won’t even get going until after the new year. Why would they let Apple start talking about their film before they do? That was rhetorical by the way. They wouldn’t.

    https://www.traileraddict.com/focus-2014

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • [TImothy Auld] “Really? A Tumblr page? “

    Hey, you wanted some examples, those are examples. What exactly are you looking for>

    [TImothy Auld] “And, once again, why does not the oft cited “Focus” feature appear on the FCPX “in action” page?”

    Based on my experience working with moving picture studios, my guess would be that WB doesn’t want Apple to say anything about it until closer to the release date when their own campaign is done.

    No defense of Apple’s (non) marketing here, but I wouldn’t read too much into the presence of Focus on Apple’s site right now.

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Why? Go to fcp.co, there’s a ton of case studies if you poke around. Also, here’s a very short list of stuff. https://fcpxselects.tumblr.com

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    December 9, 2014 at 1:46 am in reply to: Avid to relist on NASDAQ

    Count me in as not being giddy. Hell, I bought V8 when it came out. The more the merrier. X is my main axe, but they all – X, 7, Pr, MC, R11(sort of…) – have their pro’s and cons. 😉

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    December 4, 2014 at 12:27 am in reply to: Speech to text

    [Oliver Peters] “I understand. Still not as useful in FCP 7. Plus it’s only tied to the clip itself, whereas sometimes it’s better to be tied to the sequence time.”

    Agreed…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    December 3, 2014 at 11:57 pm in reply to: Speech to text

    [Oliver Peters] “When I would break down interviews in FCP 7, I would add lengthy text to each marker. Right-clicking the timeline exposed a pulldown of all the marker text in a submenu. Quite handy.”

    You can still kind of do that with the timeline index, using the various marker types for different categories of notes. Would be handy if the marker text showed up in more that just the marker name though,and wrapped so no need to hover to see the complete text. Having more “notes’ fields available in list view in the browser would be nice s well…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    December 3, 2014 at 1:35 am in reply to: Pro Video Formats Update!

    [TImothy Auld] “I don’t even know what the “pro” market is anymore. If it ever even existed. “

    lol me neither really. I was joking, for old times’ sake 😉

    [TImothy Auld] “What I’d like to know is that if Apple really purchased MXF4mac then what does that buy me as an Apple customer?”

    Well, if you need to make MXF’s it gets you a solution built into the OS/Compressor/Motion/FCP X that previously cost around $900…

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Charlie Austin

    December 2, 2014 at 11:48 pm in reply to: Pro Video Formats Update!

    [Jeremy Garchow] “Looks like it was Apple that purchased MXF4mac!
    “

    Proof they’re not interested in the pro market! :-/

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

Page 78 of 258

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy