OK, thanks for the input.
I hear what you say about dpi (yeah, I work mainly in print) but…
What I’m finding is that a 720×586 image created at 72dpi in Photoshop is only just over 1MB, so fairly easily animated in AE, but soft, blurry and poor quality. The same image but created at 300dpi is way sharper in AE but it’s now 20MB but impossible to animate and throws up the old “unable to allocate space for image buffer” error message. Especially when layered with a movie file.
Image sizes of the scale you are talking about would basically kill my Mac (specs below) and give me a nice beach ball to look at while AE keels over.
What I don’t understand is that the identical 20MB image – along with a bunch of others – is so easily animated in Final Cut Express, with a virtual instant preview at max resolution, on the same Mac.
I guess what I’m arriving at here is: If Final Cut Express can process these images smoothly, why can’t AE? I’m only doing simple rotations, after all.
Sorry if this all seems terribly newbie and basic, but I am determined to get a handle on this program, from the ground up. And that means nuts and bolts like this.
Thanks
Mac Pro, 10.5.7, 2×2.66GHz, 6GB RAM, GeForce 8800GT 512MB