Bob Peterson
Forum Replies Created
-
I must be dense. I’ve looked and not found such an option. I’ll look again another day. It would be nice to see the missing posts.
-
In addition to telling us what format is used by the source files, you should also tell us a lot more about your computer.
-
You can solve the problem with a rational process or continue to complain about baby steps. It’s really a choice as to what you want to accomplish.
-
If you have the time and opportunity, I suggest you take a few courses in photography. In my area, they are offered at the local community college. They will teach you many of the basics like focus, shutter speed, aperture, lighting, and all of the things that you need to know to get consistently good images.
-
Vegas Pro 12 Build 770 is what I am routinely using for all of my work these days. I prefer to work with wav files. I have not had any problems with wav files. I do prefer to use an M-Audio ProFire 610 to support audio in Vegas, but I also frequently wind up using the Microsoft Sound Mapper. Neither device has encountered any problem at all.
-
Left click on the media in Project Media, right click and left click on “Open in Trimmer”. That seems quick and simple to me.
-
This is what I was going to suggest, and it solved a similar problem for me long ago.
-
My guess is probably not. Capture does not seem to be a focus of attention in Vegas these days because cameras have moved away from tape. For tape users, many are using third party applications to perform the capture function. I, for example, use HDVSplit to capture HD video from a Canon XH-A1. I know you are talking about streaming rather than tape, but I’m guessing that Vegas capture is still tape oriented.
-
The time honored way to blur the background of an image is with the camera’s lens. For example, a lens with a large aperture allows a relatively shallow depth of focus which will blur the background while keeping the subject sharply focused. So, what you see in a sports clip is probably produced by a combination of optics and videographer technique rather than digital manipulation.
-
It’s also why Apple is an very expensive solution. High priced at the front end, and eventually requiring a replacement as the technology and Apple move on leaving the older systems unable to adapt. It does not seem that long ago that the consensus was that Nvidia was the way to go. Now, it seems that AMD is the way to go. Even if the graphics card is OK, you are still at the mercy of software developers who, in the Apple world, lack the incentive to make sure their code works on commonly used systems. I’m guessing that works best for Apple and its hardware and its software. If you always update to the latest, you will be running Apple’s hardware and Apple’s software to insure that everything keeps working.