Forum Replies Created

Page 164 of 186
  • Bob Cole

    January 19, 2006 at 4:19 am in reply to: AC3 Encoding with the new Adobe Media Encoder in PPro 2.0

    [Brian SaenzDeViteri] “I never purchased the Surcode AC3 plug-in since I had Encore available on my system. I did all my AC3 encoding in Encore and I’m assuming that Encore 2.0 will still do my AC3 encoding, especially when purchasing Surcode will run another $300”

    The reason I bought Surcode for PP 1.5 was to do 5.1 audio. I found that I could not do that inside Encore. (Was I wrong?)

  • Bob Cole

    January 19, 2006 at 1:05 am in reply to: AC3 Encoding with the new Adobe Media Encoder in PPro 2.0

    If you have the SSurcode license with PP 1.5, doyou have to buy it again to use it in PP 2?

  • Bob Cole

    January 17, 2006 at 10:04 pm in reply to: Premiere Pro 2 – Cost of Ownership

    As a longtime PC user, and someone who was hoping that PP 2 would be a home run, I find your comments both troubling and persuasive. The pricing on FCP Studio Universal had me checking and re-checking. It’s pretty generous, esp. in contrast to the way Adobe is pricing the Studio upgrades for those of us who own most of the pieces, but not the “studio.”

    It makes sense in a business way, I guess. Apple sells hardware, Adobe only software. But as far as the end user is concerned, it’s more reason to look at FCP.

    — Bob C

  • Bob Cole

    January 17, 2006 at 4:21 pm in reply to: Adobe has created quite a nightmare

    [Steven L. Gotz] “even though I own a few different apps, I don’t get credit for that when upgrading to one of the packages.”

    Agreed.

    I just called Adobe to complain, “I have several of the pieces of Studio, and feel as if I’ll be paying twice if I upgrade to Studio. Are there any further discounts if you own several of the eligible software packages?”

    The answer was “No. Not now. Maybe later. You’re the second person who’s asked that so far today.”

    If others make this request, maybe they’ll listen? Probably not.

    — Bob C.

  • Bob Cole

    January 17, 2006 at 2:39 am in reply to: checking a project without a DVD-R

    Thanks for the ideas. The only remaining question is how to check the “layer break” without actually burning a DVD-DL. Unless… checking the project on the hard drive simulates that as well?

    — Bob C

  • Bob Cole

    January 16, 2006 at 11:36 pm in reply to: backgrounds

    John, do you use the canvas or the muslin? I understand that the canvas is less prone to wrinkling and developing wear marks, but it has to be transported rolled up, while the muslin can be stuffed into a bag. I was wondering whether the muslin backdrops develop distracting wrinkles, but I’m guessing you throw them out of focus anyway, correct?

    — Bob C

  • Bob Cole

    January 14, 2006 at 5:28 pm in reply to: checking a project without a DVD-R

    [Aanarav Sareen] “use a virtual DVD mounter such as Daemon Tools”

    Aanarav, I’m pretty cautious about installing DVD software because some of it interferes with the DVD burning process — does Daemon Tools present any problems?

    Thanks to all. I’m proceeding into DLT-land.

    — Bob C

  • Bob Cole

    January 11, 2006 at 4:11 pm in reply to: “To DLT or not to DLT – that is the question”

    When I eBay for DLT IV I see tons of 40/80 tape cartridges on offer. Are you saying that a tape drive that says 20/40 will accept these cartridges?

    Again, forgive the total ignorance, and thanks for your prior explanations.

  • [Tim Kolb] “you could try giving him any “dry” assets…basically short of the AE project, and see if that placates him I suppose.”

    This came up on an AE list, and Tim’s solution was the one offered, with a twist:

    If your AE project uses lots of plug-ins, you’ll hand over the .aep, but of course you’ll be legally unable to hand over the plug-ins. If the client tries to use it without you, he will discover that he still needs you.

    — Bob C

  • Bob Cole

    January 11, 2006 at 3:36 am in reply to: “To DLT or not to DLT – that is the question”

    Perhaps I’m making too much of this, but I’m seeing all sorts of DLT drives and tapes, 20/40 gb, 35/70 gb, etc. Does that matter, or is any DLT cartridge going to be acceptable to replicators?

Page 164 of 186

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy