Andy Neil
Forum Replies Created
-
The problem is two or more of your bundle settings are attempting to save the file under the same name. A way around this is to create custom settings in compressor where it can append the setting to the filename, and then use those custom compressor settings as your bundle.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
What you’re probably seeing is a result of FPX only showing one field in the viewer. There’s a setting in the upper right-hand corner where you can tell it to show both fields. That artifact you’re seeing is due to the fact that QuickTime is trying to play interlaced footage on a progressive computer screen. If you made a DVD of your export and played it on a regular television it would look totally fine. All computer screens are progressive but your footage is interlaced. If you want to keep your footage interlaced, then you’re going to have to put up with that artifact if you view both fields.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
[Dan Worley] “Is there a way I can gradually slow down the pan and then freeze the frame so it will look natural?”
The answer is no, not really. The problem is: as you approach a still (your stopping point), the slow-motion becomes harder and harder to interpolate. The program has to guess too much about nonexisting frames. Some of this can be smoothed out with optical flow but you’ll never get it to look like a natural pan and stop. Particularly because still images have a different quality to them than moving video.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
You can do both. For number one, import your new mix of audio. Open your multi-clip. Create a new angle and drop the new audio into that angle. Sync with the rest of your footage and then set that as the audio monitoring angle.
For number two, open up the multi-clip and apply EQ to the audio angle. The changes will ripple down to the edits in the timeline.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
Not with the default masks. Is might be possible by creating a custom mask in Motion. Haven’t really tried to do it myself. What specific effect are you trying to accomplish?
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
What’s your workflow like? Are you passing projects back-and-forth between editors?
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
Geez Walter and Jeremy. Get a room. 🙂
I’m going to have to unsubscribe to this thread just to get any work done.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “I’m not sure what your point is?”
I think that FCPX’s force configured windows tend to rustle Aindreas’s jimmies. That’s fine. I hate, hate, HATE Premiere’s icons and buttons, probably with the same fervor. And the eye-strain inducing UI clutter. And round knobs on mouse-based software to emulate a physical control panel that I don’t have.
But the tilde key IS pretty cool.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
I mean, even Spider-man doesn’t use toe shoes and that man is in a full length onesie.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos
-
You do this by duplicating your thought bubble layer (which you make with the bezier shape tool). You put an outline on the top layer and then add an image mask to it and drag the bottom layer onto the image mask. Set the mask to subtract and it will cut out the bubble.
You can scale the top layer up a bit if you want to alter how much of an edge you have surrounding your bubble. You can feather the bottom shape to change how well it composites with the top shape.
Hope this helps.
Andy
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107277729326633563425/videos