[Alekos Mazzolotti]

Hello again!

Just came up with a solution. I’m sharing it in case anyone else has the same problem. For a 2-dimensional property, the correct form of the expression is:

if (numKeys > 1){

v1 = valueAtTime(key(1).time);

v2 = valueAtTime(key(2).time);

newV2 = (link to slider);

x = linear(value[0],v1[0],v2[0],v1[0],newV2);

y = (value of choice);

[x,y]

}

else{
value
};

If you are looking to change the y value, change the zeroes for “1” and invert “x = ” with “y = “. And there we have it 😎

[Alekos Mazzolotti]

Man, I love this forum ?

Ended up with my own combined function, to ease cubic in and exponential out. Turns out all I really needed was to get this function thing right. Never used it before.

I’ll share my final result in a simplified version, case anyone desires to make good use of it.

Thanks a lot for your help =)

myEase = function (t, b, c, d) {
t /= d/2;
if (t < 1) return c/2*t*t*t + b;
t --;
return c/2 * ( -Math.pow( 2, -10 * t) + 2 ) + b;
};

dur = 1
myEase(time-inPoint,1,100,dur)

[Alekos Mazzolotti]

Wonderful!

One last question: how do I like your answer a thousand times? ahahahah

Thanks a huge lot, friend.

[Alekos Mazzolotti]

Beautiful! Works as clock!!

Just out of curiosity, what if I were to apply the same concept to the “offset” property, in ramp up mode, that, instead of going from 0 to 100, must be set to variate from -100 to +100?

Thanks a huge lot for your help!

[Alekos Mazzolotti]

Magnificent!

It worked perfectly. Thanks a whole lot, friend!

[Alekos Mazzolotti]

Sure!

Here, that’s what I did manually:

In this example, as I said, there is no real randomness, for I used keyframes and a loopout expression in a manner that created more or less the same effect.

Can I create this behavior via expression?