Aindreas Gallagher
Forum Replies Created
-
Aindreas Gallagher
August 2, 2014 at 1:48 pm in reply to: Sharknado 2 edited on…..(drumroll) Premiere Pro CCWell at least we settled the issue of asymmetrical audio dissolves and future microwaves. That was fresh ground.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
Aindreas Gallagher
August 2, 2014 at 1:37 am in reply to: Sharknado 2 edited on…..(drumroll) Premiere Pro CC[Charlie Austin] “Doesn’t seem that complex to me. Pretty simple actually.”
well that’s definitely one way of looking at it.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
Aindreas Gallagher
August 2, 2014 at 1:20 am in reply to: Sharknado 2 edited on…..(drumroll) Premiere Pro CCcharlie as best as I can put it, the reason the X timeline should fail is because it fails as a coding exercise. Everything on it has a conditional state. They’re not extant video objects, they’re all in really circumscribed conditional states.
that timeline deserves to die because its a stupid application of coding, and that timeline can be pulled apart over the course of 30 seconds of intense effort. the X timeline is wildly over-engineered. Apple need to back off and produce robust dis-interested VA objects in a clear absolute time. they can’t all have massively complex parent subordinate statements relative to each other. If Apple wanted to do that they should have built smoke with a room that made it nodally explicit.
there is no point in apple having conceptually tortured the timeline in they way they have, because it leads to no nodal statement or other expression that builds on the forced relationships they are demanding in the timeline. In essence – why are we all going through this, when the incredibly intricate relationships have no further value outside moving clumps on the timeline?
Where is the valid post production expression of these stupidly complex VA interlinked editing relationships?
is it just for fun?what in the exact hell is all this pointless complexity for?
bueller?
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
Aindreas Gallagher
August 2, 2014 at 12:42 am in reply to: Sharknado 2 edited on…..(drumroll) Premiere Pro CCcharlie, a feature being cut in X is immense good news. realtime 64×64 video grids maybe not so much.
If you think the timeline is fine – great. there is a terrific argument that apple have unanswered questions in their timeline.
While I don’t have time now, if you like, I will demonstrate this later.I find you can casually tear the entire FCPX timeline apart with audio above and below, connected clips and secondary storylines. Pretty soon X is creating dissolve only secondary storylines etc. If you really really try, the X timeline has absolutely no clue what’s happening. it’s in spasms.
I just did an hour or two at it, and its pretty entertaining.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
[Neil Goodman] “I was saying i was jealous of people with NLE ambiguity. “
yes. goes to short skill and application my end. that said – avid good jesus. How? How and how for god’s sake?
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
Aindreas Gallagher
August 2, 2014 at 12:13 am in reply to: Sharknado 2 edited on…..(drumroll) Premiere Pro CCjesus never show that again. that’s a michael bayhem transformers extinction level pointless power show of editing.
“the only reason we went with FCPX was that it could handle 64 layers of video with ease”
barf. Charlie: Barf.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
Aindreas Gallagher
August 1, 2014 at 11:52 pm in reply to: Sharknado 2 edited on…..(drumroll) Premiere Pro CCsure why not just say that Jan Kovacs is cutting Will Smith’s hundred million feature for Warner Bros on X?
because he is cutting it, and it’s beyond obvious he’s cutting it on X?
https://twitter.com/S0nofaB1tch
It should beat the arriving PPro Fincher/Coen Brothers to the punch – why not trumpet it in the meantime?
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
give him hell egger. also never let anyone diss your audio dissolve. stand proud you X people.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
there you are – to recall, STP even pleasingly animated the bridge curves on the join. adobe does look, as ever, a tiny bit GUI janky.
although if you did have a dream, it would run to the tune of a committed team somehow visibly producing near nothing bar odds and ends with a carefully re-constructed file container media handling system for around two years now?
It seems really hard to believe that that has entirely occupied the minds of a profitable, intellectual mad house bleeding edge pro apps team.
for 24 months.or this is just pages, and they’re playing cards. Or maybe there’s a pride thing, and it’s a swift situation.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics
-
ah fair ball charlie. thanks for digging that out.
he did docs – they started on film (!) – he was never hugely specific, just recalled the steel recorders were seriously crazy machines at the time – rough guess late sixties equipment in irish television.
https://vimeo.com/user1590967/videos http://www.ogallchoir.net promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics