Aindreas Gallagher
Forum Replies Created
-
I should add, bar the ludicrous ranting –
I am not in any sense referring to Randy Ubillos the individual, I am only referring to Randy Ubillos the Hal9000 progenitor of FCPX, and in that fashion alone.
The man himself is palpably a dude who bashes out to antarctica and merrily throws himself into water penguins might well be scared of.
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
the essential apple statement is taste: that they are their own weather vane?
Jobs said it for years – we make the stuff we would want to use.
ipod, iphone, ipad – god knows that was thunder and lightning.but as an insular credo applied to the complexities of professional craft? it is a mess.
Colour coded Roles? Really? What?
Why stop there? Ye have only begun to remake editing in your own vision.
what’s next? Spines? Red light GUI T-junctions for non-intersecting vertically connected edits?Apple have only begun to re-make editing in their image.
FCPX is not a professional application, simply because it came out of a very weird room with five guys in it who never edited – and it is loaded with ridiculous metaphors that have no broader context or meaning.
And its colour corrector is square.
FCPX is a dead, internal, Apple vanity project.http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
I was not here. Until I actually shagging learn Avid – and gentlepeople – this is free and rather good –
https://www.promax.com/s-130-edit-to-the-future.aspx
Until I do that and, say, properly take in FCPX, I am bidden by God to shut up –
Still… one thing, and Bill I am begging you on this.
Stop, please jesus I beg you, stop saying simple as that.
your overall judicial end quote is, I realise, your own mount rushmore.
but you actually do need to stop saying ‘simple as that.’that genuinely has to happen.
I am willing to take this as far as the UN.
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
Aindreas Gallagher
January 8, 2012 at 10:36 pm in reply to: OT New Yorker feature on YouTube’s planstrue and all, thought it was notable that the best charlie sheen bit in that crazy time was his skit for funny or die.
https://www.funnyordie.com/videos/bfb12aea47/charlie-sheen-s-winning-recipes
its hard to argue with him threatening his kitchen knife with his pocket knife.
still and all – funny or die do apparently edit on avid….
https://www.funnyordie.com/videos/f1fb270652/whoosh
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
Aindreas Gallagher
January 7, 2012 at 4:46 pm in reply to: Interesting article on using FCPX for BroadcastI’d say that last post wasn’t a rant really – and if it was, it was largely marks. I’m curious – what do you say to his observations though?
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
Aindreas Gallagher
January 7, 2012 at 4:38 pm in reply to: Interesting article on using FCPX for Broadcastmaybe a little bit – all you’re really saying there is that you can make an attached clip, I’m talking about editing into something other than the primary.
mark morache says this better than I can – and I reckon he’s putting in at least as much effort into this as you are:
I’ve tried putting audio as the primary storyline, then adding b-roll as a secondary storyline. It feels awkward to me. I really like using I and O on the timeline, and even if I have the secondary storyline selected, it still sets the region on the primary storyline.After I set my points, I can hit the Q key to make a new connected clip, the hit P and drag the connected clip into the secondary storyline. #awkward
If I set my points THEN select the secondary storyline, my range disappears. The only way I can select a range in the secondary storyline is with the range tool and the mouse. #awkward
the point I’m trying to make here is that it really is in a sense a single track editor. everything after that is a mess of poor metaphors and stupid workflow. I find it ludicrous. It feels cumbersome and stupid.
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
Aindreas Gallagher
January 7, 2012 at 2:15 pm in reply to: Interesting article on using FCPX for Broadcastyou’re right – that is trolling, but sometimes when one says FCPX conventions out loud they really do sound tortured and ludicrous.
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
Aindreas Gallagher
January 7, 2012 at 3:02 am in reply to: Interesting article on using FCPX for Broadcastthat was really classy, some grinning guy in a baseball cap.
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
Aindreas Gallagher
January 7, 2012 at 2:37 am in reply to: Interesting article on using FCPX for Broadcasthonestly jeremy? that is just a mess of stupid weirdness that nobody will remember in three years. I cant operate consistently outside of the primary, I cant edit consistently outside of the primary, I can’t .. ara god, look it doesn’t matter.
Just because the i and o is visually marked on the primary doesn’t mean the incoming media has to go on to the primary.It can go above/below as connected clips using the range you marked.
You can also select a connected clip above the primary and edit with a browser based clip as well.
nobody cares about all the weird stupid conventions jeremy – no wait, we do – it actually is fully stupid forgettable software.
ech.
http://www.ogallchoir.net
promo producer/editor.grading/motion graphics -
Aindreas Gallagher
January 7, 2012 at 1:21 am in reply to: Interesting article on using FCPX for Broadcast