Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Wouldn’t it be time to change the name of the forum ?
-
Wouldn’t it be time to change the name of the forum ?
Posted by Emmanuel Tenenbaum on March 1, 2016 at 12:45 pmIt’s not 2011 anymore, FCPX has changed.
Doug Suiter replied 10 years, 2 months ago 11 Members · 12 Replies -
12 Replies
-
Oliver Peters
March 1, 2016 at 12:50 pm[Emmanuel Tenenbaum] “It’s not 2011 anymore, FCPX has changed.”
That sounds like as good a name as any 🙂
OTOH, the current name has become almost an established “brand”.
Oliver
Oliver Peters Post Production Services, LLC
Orlando, FL
http://www.oliverpeters.com -
Scott Witthaus
March 1, 2016 at 1:05 pmYes, we should change it. FCPX is the best NLE that has ever existed on any planet in any galaxy, so there is no debate.
We can change it to: “Old Farts to Like to Argue”
😉
Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter -
Noah Kadner
March 1, 2016 at 3:32 pmI prefer a title which embraces these millenial times-
“NLE-OMG”
Noah
FCPWORKS – FCPX Workflow
FCP Exchange – FCPX Workshops -
Scott Witthaus
March 1, 2016 at 3:49 pm[Scott Witthaus] “”Old Farts to Like to Argue””
WHO like to argue, that is…
Scott Witthaus
Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
1708 Inc./Editorial
Professor, VCU Brandcenter -
Shane Ross
March 2, 2016 at 12:51 am[Craig Seeman] “Perhaps more appropriate would be.
FCPX WTF”
Craig FTW!
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
John Pale
March 2, 2016 at 1:57 pmShould probably leave the name the same. Not much has changed here…it’s kind of like stepping into a timeless NLE debate vortex. I only check in every now and again and every time I do, it seems people are still often having the same heated discussion.
I guess that’s more than a bit unfair. There actually is a lot of interesting discussion here, but I am amazed by the longevity of the arguments surrounding FCPX’s user interface, etc, and whether it’s pro enough. And the strange reporting of any link that announces the onset of Adobe or Avid’s imminent demise…as if FCPX needs any validation by the misfortunes or missteps of its competitors. FCPX “arrived” long ago. It’s certainly not everyone’s cup of tea, but it’s very capable at what it does. If you don’t like it, there are plenty of very good alternatives. Or use them all…they each have their strengths and weaknesses (as do the companies than make said NLEs).
-
Steve Connor
March 2, 2016 at 2:00 pm[John Pale] “Should probably leave the name the same. “
How about
“FCPX or Not – The debate remains the same”
-
David Mathis
March 2, 2016 at 3:41 pmPerhaps the name should be changed to “Should We Change The Name?” Perhaps we could even start a new debate forum on the name change, after all we are debating!
-
Doug Suiter
March 3, 2016 at 12:32 amI actually happen to agree. I would like to see this forum and the FCPX Techniques forum merge into the FCPX forum. Many if not most of the posts on this forum are interchangeable with the posts on the other forum. I wouldn’t subscribe to a forum to follow a “debate” over “FCPX or not”. I am subscribed to this forum…despite the anachronistic name.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up