Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Sure hope this place stays relevant…
-
Sure hope this place stays relevant…
Steve Connor replied 8 years, 7 months ago 12 Members · 36 Replies
-
Andrew Kimery
September 18, 2017 at 7:07 pm[Steve Connor] “I also think it would be fine to rename this forum “NLE Debates” or something similar to more accurately reflect what it is, but Tim’s “da man” on this one and he’s made his thoughts clear on the subject ☺
“Try not to quote myself, but i’m too lazy to type it out again… ????
[Andrew Kimery] “This forum, though, is dedicated to a debate about how Apple’s ‘re-imagined’ NLE experience compares/contrasts to the ‘traditional’ NLE approach used by MC, PPro, Resolve, Vegas, FCP Legend, Lightworks, etc.,.
Some others think that this place is a just general round-robin, NLE beat’em up forum, and want to given it a generic name that doesn’t involve FCP X, but I think that ignores the unique philosophical underpinnings of X which are at the heart of the debate. Tim doesn’t keep FCP X in the forum title as cheap way to swindle clicks from passersby, he keeps it in the forum title because this place is about how X’s new philosophy compares to the pre-existing philosophy that almost all other NLEs use some variation of. “
https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/335/97473
[Shane Ross] “Those posts do not show up in google searches. “
Agreed. The search-ability of social media typically sucks (especially with social sites constantly tweaking with how messages are displayed in each users’ feed). This definitely erodes the amount of communal knowledge that is available.
-
Oliver Peters
September 18, 2017 at 7:30 pm[Shane Ross] “Those posts do not show up in google searches. “
They are also horribly threaded. Facebook is a terrible vehicle for forum style discussions.
– Oliver
Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com
-
Andy Patterson
September 18, 2017 at 7:30 pm[Steve Connor] “[andy patterson] “Having said that what about the BS in the video link below from an editor who should have known better. I proved that to be false!
”Are you going to mention this in EVERY single post you make???”
Bill has started several threads exactly like the one you are commenting now but that type or repetitiveness does not bother you. Having said that the video link was recently the topic of debate as someone mentioned. Many people badmouthed Premiere Pro. It demonstrates Bill has selective vision. I consider it worth posting in this thread.
[Steve Connor] “[andy patterson] “Premiere Pro does not seem to bother you so why are you so concerned about FCPX? It seems like favoritism to me.”
I know someone who does exactly the same thing for PPro, he even makes videos about it :)”
Who in the Cow glorifies Premiere Pro? Please point them out. Who in the Cow starts threads every 6-7 weeks about people being hostile towards Premiere Pro? Who do you know like that?
I set the record straight! Sometimes with a video sometime with a comment. Isn’t it good to eliminate the BS at the Cow? Shouldn’t that be encourage around here rather than just spewing BS and useless rhetoric? Instead of glorifying FCPX Bill should demonstrate in a video how FCPX can do pancake editing better than Premiere Pro or something similar? Having said who on the Cow claims time and time again that Premiere Pro is revolutionary, amazing and innovative? Please call that person out for me. For the record I myself have bad mouthed Premiere Pro more than FCPX here at the Cow. I also have videos where I badmouth Premiere Pro. Having said that how many times have you badmouthed FCPX. Is it really wise for the pot to call the kettle black?
-
Steve Connor
September 18, 2017 at 8:16 pm[andy patterson] “Bill has started several threads exactly like the one you are commenting now but that type or repetitiveness does not bother you.”
Oh yes it does 🙂
-
Neil Goodman
September 19, 2017 at 2:28 am[Steve Connor] “[Scott Witthaus] “My bookmark is now on the FCPX Techniques site, where there are real users with real questions. I link here from there. Maybe this forum should be shut down as (a) there is no longer any debate and (b) not much about FCPX except from the usual suspects and the other NLE discussions can retire to the proper sites.
. ”Clearly not reading the forum much Scott as there is plenty of debate on here, there is always talk of FCPX and this IS the proper site for debating NLEs
As for shutting the forum down it would be a lot simpler if all the people whingeing and moaning about the content here just stayed away and left us all to it.”
Amen!
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up