Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

  • Posted by Carlos Ferguson on December 23, 2008 at 4:27 am

    Hello,

    I am editting 1504 x 1000 pixel still jpegs into an animation. I am not yet sure how I will output the resulting animation. I would like to retain as much flexibility and resolution as possible.

    This is what I have currently for my settings, based on some information I found online about editing animations. My computer can’t keep up and I am wondering if there is a better way, different compression, other things I should be considering?

    Frame Size: 1504 x 1000 Pixels
    Editing Timebase: 29.97 fps
    Field Dominance: None
    Pixel Aspect Ratio: Square
    Anamorphic 16:9: Off
    Video Processing: RGB Only
    White Point: N/A

    Compressor: Photo – JPEG
    Millions of Colors (24 bit)
    No Data Rate Limit
    No Keyframes Set
    Quality: 100

    Audio Settings:
    16-bit 48.000 kHz Stereo

    A second question – I did a bunch of editing using a sequence setting of 640 x 441 – is there any way to transfer this editing to another sequence with the higher (1504 x 1000) resolution, or is it all lost?

    Thanks for any help, it is much appreciated.

    Carlos Ferguson

    Captain Mench replied 17 years, 4 months ago 3 Members · 3 Replies
  • 3 Replies
  • Bill Dewald

    December 23, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    Final Cut Pro is not designed to work with non-standard frame sizes.

    What is the final deliverable for your project? Web, HD tape, DVD?

    The answer will inform your sequence settings.

  • Carlos Ferguson

    December 23, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    Thanks for the help!

    I would like to be able to output this for web, burn it to a dvd (high resolution if possible) and project it from a computer. These different outputs probably need different sequence settings?

    Last night I was trying to solve this problem and came up with this work-around…

    I use offline RT ntsc (photo jpeg) codec to edit the film with a setting of 351×250 pixels, then when I am done I use the media manager to re-compress the film to a higher resolution 1504×1000. Then I could output it with h264 to have it play from my computer?

    I’m wondering if this is an ok plan or if I should fix on an output format (like hd) before I start?

    Thanks,

    Carlos Ferguson

  • Captain Mench

    December 31, 2008 at 3:28 pm

    What I suggest you do is create a sequence that will work best for FCP and look natural to the eye.

    Say… 720×480 or 720×480 anamorphic (16:9) or a basic PAL configuration.

    This will do two things, again, make it pleasing to the eye and also make it simple for FCP to deal with it.

    Then, edit your photos in the timeline scaling and moving to taste.

    When you export… you can export to Broadband High and set the size from the OPTIONS button.

    Will look great and relatively small file size.

    More info to follow as needed.

    Mike

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy