-
Standard Candle R10
Hello everyone,
now that Resolve 10.1 is out officially and people are getting their hands on new MacPros, its time to update the Standard Candle.
A standard candle is a known source of luminosity .
It defines the distance of an object based on its magnitude
Here some more detailed information what it is used in astronomy :
https://www.astro.ex.ac.uk/people/hatchell/rinr/candles.pdfI created a Resolve document that everyone can import and flick through the versions to see how much GPU performance their system has.
Please post the numbers and refer to this thread as a reference how “good” your system performs.
There is only one footage file used and it comes with the installer of Resolve and Resolve Light.
So the only thing you need to do is to use the “Change source folder” function to re-link to the file called “Tutorial – Tracking.mov”The project itself is HD with 100% default values , the footage is HD this time but again its not relevant for disk performance.
This test is designed to put stress on your GPU pipeline, so be sure you have enough cooling.
When testing please load VERSION 1 first, press play and check your FPS.
Lets it spool up an check out on what FPS number it settles in.
If it flicks between two numbers, go for the lower one and discard the .5
Press Stop and advance to the next version.
The TNR nodes will shuffle image around so there is no looping memory cache.Here the results from our system.
Mac Pro 5.1
Processor 2 x 2.4 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon with 20GB
OSX 10.8.5
Display : Quadro 4000
GPU : Cubix Desktop with 3x GTX 680V01 06 blur nodes 24 fps
V02 12 blur nodes 24 fps
V03 24 blur nodes 22 fps
V04 36 blur nodes 15 fps
V05 01 TNR nodes 24 fps
V06 02 TNR nodes 24 fps
V07 03 TNR nodes 13 fps
V08 04 TNR nodes 08 fpsHere is the link to the updated R10.2 version
https://carousel.hu/standardcandle/Post you results and system specs in this thread and keep the discussion short.
If you can please do tests on OSX 10.8.5 and OSX 10.9.1 using the same hardware.
Windows and Linux specs are more than welcome as well 🙂Happy testing !
A slice of color…
Resolve 10.1.0.021
Colorist / VFX / Aerial footage nerd
https://vimeo.com/saschahaber -
29 Replies
-
Mac Pro 5.1
Processor 2 x 2.66 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon with 48GB RAM
OSX 10.8.5
Resolve Version: 10.1.0.021
Display : GTX580 3GB EVGA
GPU : Cubix Desktop with 4x GTX TitanV01 06 blur nodes 24 fps
V02 12 blur nodes 24 fps
V03 24 blur nodes 24 fps
V04 36 blur nodes 24 fps
V05 01 TNR nodes 24 fps
V06 02 TNR nodes 24 fps
V07 03 TNR nodes 21 fps
V08 04 TNR nodes 14 fps -
All right…all right…seems like we need more normal nodes for the Titans.
Colin, could you double Version 3 or 4 and see if it bogs down below 24 ?But nice to see the TNR is almost the same.
Could anyone from BMD chime in and let us know if TNR is CPU or GPU dependent ?
And what is the status of AMD ?A slice of color…
Resolve 10.1.0.021
Colorist / VFX / Aerial footage nerd
https://vimeo.com/saschahaber -
Sascha, would you mind if I would host it? It would never expire, and we could update it to every new version.
link (not quite ready yet, but almost): https://carousel.hu/standardcandle/ -
Hey Laco,
thanks for the offer, much appreciated…
I just updated the test to also put some stress on Titans…
Here is the link and my numbers again…So everyone, give this one a shot and let us know if its to much now.
If not this will become the new standard.Mac Pro 5.1
Processor 2 x 2.4 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon with 20GB
OSX 10.8.5
Display : Quadro 4000
GPU : Cubix Desktop with 3x GTX 680V01 09 blur nodes 24 fps
V02 18 blur nodes 24 fps
V03 30 blur nodes 18 fps
V04 66 blur nodes 09 fps
V05 01 TNR nodes 24 fps
V06 02 TNR nodes 24 fps
V07 03 TNR nodes 13 fps
V08 04 TNR nodes 08 fpsA slice of color…
Resolve 10.1.0.021
Colorist / VFX / Aerial footage nerd
https://vimeo.com/saschahaber -
link updated!
-
Mac Pro 5.1
Processor 2 x 2.66 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon with 48GB
OSX 10.8.5
Resolve Version: 10.1.0.021
Display : GTX580 3GB EVGA
GPU : Cubix Desktop with 4x GTX TitanV01 09 blur nodes 24 fps
V02 18 blur nodes 24 fps
V03 30 blur nodes 24 fps
V04 66 blur nodes 15 fps
V05 01 TNR nodes 24 fps
V06 02 TNR nodes 24 fps
V07 03 TNR nodes 22 fps
V08 04 TNR nodes 14 fps -
Good 🙂
That might be the highest score we will see.Come on guys, give us some low numbers now…anyone with a standard system ?
A slice of color…
Resolve 10.1.0.021
Colorist / VFX / Aerial footage nerd
https://vimeo.com/saschahaber -
Have a new 6 core d500’s on eval. Couldn’t get d700 8 core 🙁
Will run the test in the morning.
-
Mac Pro 6,1 Late 2013
Processor 3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5 with 64GB
OSX 10.9.1
Resolve Version: 10.1.0.021
Display : AMD FirePro D700 6144MB
GPU : AMD FirePro D700 6144MBV01 09 blur nodes 24 fps
V02 18 blur nodes 24 fps
V03 30 blur nodes 24 fps
V04 66 blur nodes 6 fps
V05 01 TNR nodes 24 fps
V06 02 TNR nodes 13 fps
V07 03 TNR nodes 9 fps
V08 04 TNR nodes 7 fps -
Mac Pro 6,1 Late 2013
Processor 3.5 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon E5 with 16GB
OSX 10.9.1
Resolve Version: 10.1.0.021
2 X D500 3Gig RamShots so short it doesn’t get upto speed :-/
Also the Blurs are Blur > Sharpen > Blur .. kit misleading. Plus they are matted.
Where do we measure the FPS from ?
S
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up