Activity › Forums › Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy › SONY PVM-1354Q CRT NTSC Monitor Vs. Sony LMD1420 Luma LCD Monitor
-
SONY PVM-1354Q CRT NTSC Monitor Vs. Sony LMD1420 Luma LCD Monitor
Jeremy Garchow replied 20 years, 2 months ago 8 Members · 32 Replies
-
Jeremy Garchow
February 22, 2006 at 4:39 amThe 14L5/1 most certainly has 16:9. THis is from the b and h webpage that you sent out.
“Sony PVM-14L5/1 14″ Color Multiformat Monitor with 800 Lines, 4:3/16:9, NTSC/PAL and Component”
-
Jeremy Garchow
February 22, 2006 at 4:47 am720p comes out at 720p60. 1080p24 is line doubled/interlaced to 1080i48.
-
Pierre
February 22, 2006 at 4:59 amYes it does have 16:9. I have no idea how I managed to overlook that?
thanks for all your help guys!
Best,
Michael -
Arnie Schlissel
February 22, 2006 at 6:16 pmUsed for $1200 vs new for $1500? Not a hard choice for me at all! I’d get the new one. And B&H is a good place to buy it from, too.
Per the eBay listing: “IMPORTANT NOTE: WE ARE THE ONLY SUPPLIERS IN THE U.S. OFFERING FULLY REFURBISHED, PRECISION CALIBRATED, BROADCAST QUALITY “ENGINEERING” MONITORS FOR PRODUCTION AND POST PRODUCTION APPLICATIONS! “ Yeah, right, sez you! There are several good places here in NYC that will refurb & sell used monitors. I’d expect that there are at least 1 or 2 places in every major city in the US.
Arnie
https://www.arniepix.com -
Joslyn
February 22, 2006 at 7:49 pmdoes the pvm14L5/1 support 24 frames progressive through component? i know the original model(pvm14L5) did not support 24p so i’m wondering if this upgraded feature was through component and/or sdi.
-
Jeremy Garchow
February 22, 2006 at 8:30 pmYes, again. It’s what the /1 is for.
What format are you playing out?
-
Joslyn
February 22, 2006 at 9:51 pmi’m still waiting on my hvx200 so no way for me to test it out. thanks for the confirmation.
-
Patrick Inhofer
February 22, 2006 at 11:33 pm[jaser] “so 24p support via component?”
I have a 20L5 that also supports the various HD formats via analog component.
To help you manage your expectations I’ll share what I found…
Interlaced HD footage looks really good. Just what you expect out of HD. And it’s terrific that such an affordable display is so versatile. But a 20″ monitor feels a little small for widescreen, so it loses some impact – yet you should be able to do good critical viewing.
Progressive footage is completely underwhelming. It looks SD. There’s no pop to the image. And while not fuzzy, it’s not as crisp and defined as I’d expect. This isn’t entirely surprising given it’s a CRT designed specifically for interlaced footage. Progressive is best watched on a true progressive display.
Good luck!
– pi
Patrick Inhofer
editor, compositor, nice guy
Fini, nyc
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up