Activity › Forums › Avid Media Composer › size does matter
-
size does matter
Posted by Dan Newton on June 13, 2009 at 7:53 pmHey
Have a small question —-
someone asked me — what is the best quality to edit on and how big would the file normally be — now I wasn’ sure how to answer that —
so this is what I need to know —
would it be a avi or mov etc…, and what would the size be if it was the following lengths:-
1. 30 seconds
2. 45 seconds
3. 1 min
4. 5 min +
please please help me out with this
cheers guys,
awaiting for your reply
Job Ter burg replied 16 years, 11 months ago 5 Members · 8 Replies -
8 Replies
-
Michael Phillips
June 14, 2009 at 2:19 amSD or HD? an uncompressed SD file is ~1 min/GB.
Michael
Michael Phillips
-
Kris Anderson
June 14, 2009 at 3:44 amBest quality is always uncompressed.
Please specify PAL/NTSC/SD/HD and what editing system you’re using, also what your images have been shot on.
-
Dan Newton
June 14, 2009 at 3:59 amIT WILL BE EITHER ONE OF THE THREE —-
SD
HD
PALTHEY WOULD BE SHOT ON EITHER ONE OF THE TWO
RED
35 MMAND SOMETIMES I JUST GET AN ANIMATION — WHICH WAS CREATED FROM SCRATCH —- ON AFTER EFFECTS
PLEASE ADVISE THE SIZES AND HOW BIG THE FILES WOULD BE
CHEERS MATES
-
Kris Anderson
June 14, 2009 at 6:18 amMate, the file size will vary depending on the compression rate applied. Can you be more specific? What editing system are you using and what is the desired end result/output format? Are you the editor? Are you cutting offline or online?
All of these are required to answer your question accurately.
-
Dan Newton
June 14, 2009 at 3:14 pmHey
I will be editing on both final cut pro and avid media composer — depends i guess
the footage is offline
so if it is offline — what would the size normally be — for a 30 second to 1 min clip
and if is online — what would the size normally be —- for a 30 second to 1 min clip
and would the best size be — 720 x 576
please advise
-
Kris Anderson
June 15, 2009 at 12:27 amDan, if you are only performing an offline edit then compression and ‘best quality’ is not really an issue. If you have limited space then compress it heavily, if you have lots of storage, back off on the compression for nicer looking pictures.
You’re going to run into trouble if you bounce back and forth between FCP and Avid…. you’re creating a lot of work for yourself that you really need not do. Pick a platform and cut on it until you finish the job would be my advice.
-
Job Ter burg
June 15, 2009 at 6:25 amHere’s the Avid storage calculator widget:
https://www.avid.com/dnxhd/widget/storage_calc_widget.html.You can also check out the section “Estimated Storage Requirements” in the Help files.
From what I’m seeing around me, most folks working on feature films use 14:1p (±75 MB/min) for SD offline editing. Now that drive space is getting cheaper, some choose 3:1p (±300 MB/min). Others prefer to work at DV25p (200 MB/min), which is sort of in the middle.
If you prefer to work in an HD resolution (only useful if you are supplied with HD dailies), there’s DNxHD36 (±250 MB/min) – which is a resolution that looks way better than it ought to, based on specs – or DNxHD115 (±800 MB/min).Especially if you can offline in HD, the Avid DNxHD36 solution is pretty ideal, since it has a fine quality with low storage requirements. AFAIK, ProRes only has two flavors, both of which require way more storage.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up