-
Reconsidering Postproduction
Hi All,
There have been some fantastic posts on this forum detailing how facilities plan to move forward in the light of FCPX. Trying several software alternatives and even exploring what Windows has to offer. But what if you’re not that person? What if you’re unable to make such large investments? What if, like me, you’re just one guy or gal considering your options and wondering if you could achieve the same for less?
I felt the release of FCPX last year presented me with an opportunity to reconsider my whole approach to postproduction and media creation. Up until then I’d been using Final Cut Studio, After Effects, Photoshop and Dreamweaver.
This is the criteria I used to shape my decision-making:
* I want to spend less on software, but still achieve high quality results
* I can take some risks as post work isn’t my main source of income
* I want to stick with OS X
* I prefer FCPX over the alternatives
* I occasionally need to master to tape
* I’m happy to spend time learning new software
* I don’t want to buy a software suite when I only use a few of the applicationsSo, I’ve searched my soul, thought the unthinkable, contemplated the infinite and this is where I’m at currently:
* Video / audio editing and colour correction: FCPX
* Sound recording and music: Garageband (including sound library from Soundtrack Pro)
* Motion graphics and visual effects: Motion, Blender
* Video graphics, web graphics and textures: GIMP
* Conversion: Compressor, Streamclip, Miro
* DVD and Blu-Ray burning: Toast
* Mastering to tape: Media Express (Blackmagic card)
* Web design and development: Aptana Studio, Joomla
* Preproduction: CeltxObviously what suits me might not suit anyone else! The very thought of open source software will send some of you running for the hills. The workflow is not as efficient as Final Cut Studio.
No doubt this list will change over the long term. It depends on the direction Apple, Adobe and other software companies take.
Ian