Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy Professional way of adding 3:2 pulldown to 24p

  • Professional way of adding 3:2 pulldown to 24p

    Posted by Daniel Stone on November 29, 2010 at 8:31 pm

    I’ve searched and haven’t found a good solution so I thought I’d start fresh.

    We edited a :30 spot in 23.98 and need to deliver as a 29.97 digital file. I searched and haven’t found a good way of doing this that gives professional results.

    Typically I play out through a Kona card to BetaSP (ugh) or through Firewire to DVCPRO… and it looks PERFECT. 29.97 with a 23.98 look. It’s hard to believe there’s not a way of doing this conversion well while keeping the output inside my computer.

    – Compressor does a surprisingly great job of making it look like it was shot in 30p – but we’re losing the 24p look.

    – Using AE to add the drop frame back in looks like garbage. The motion isn’t smooth and every 4th or so frame gets blurred.

    – Bought the Nattress standards conversion set and it also makes it look like garbage (similar to what AE does).

    Answers to questions you’ll probably ask:

    – Yes, I’m watching it on a broadcast monitor.
    – Because we filmed with the Red camera, which only films in 23.98
    – Because a couple of our stations will only take 29.97 in digital format

    Thanks so much for your help, guys!

    Daniel Stone replied 9 years, 2 months ago 8 Members · 23 Replies
  • 23 Replies
  • Daniel Stone

    November 29, 2010 at 9:15 pm

    Sorry guys – posted too soon. I experimented with the setting a little and got it looking pretty good.

    Thanks again!

  • Jerry Wise

    November 29, 2010 at 9:26 pm

    ….using what software and settings.?

  • Daniel Stone

    November 29, 2010 at 10:19 pm

    I established that. Thanks, though.

  • Daniel Stone

    November 29, 2010 at 10:23 pm

    Jerry:

    In After Effects pretty much the way Dave posted.

  • Daniel Stone

    November 29, 2010 at 11:24 pm

    Good point.

    We use Red proxies for editing which link back to the original R3D files and its metadata (which is usually 4K, always straight 23.98). I don’t think Red does any of that pulldown or 59.94 mumbo jumbo that the broadcast cameras do. We own an old tape-based Varicam and I rarely use it for that reason — there’s always some sort of frame rate or interlacing issue.

    For finishing we usually downsize the footage to 1080p, straight 23.98 within the Red software package and play out from a 1080p timeline. Basically it stays straight, clean, unmolested 23.98 the whole way through.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    November 30, 2010 at 5:32 am

    Compressor does this. In frame controls, set feld dom to upper, deinterlace and frame rate conversion to fast.

    Interlaced 3:2 pulldown. Booya.

    Jeremy

  • Matt Wiggins

    February 24, 2011 at 3:08 pm

    Hi Dave,

    I am following the method of 3:2 pulldown you described above in AE Cs5, and have a question…

    When I come upon the Render Settings, the 3:2 pulldown field is greyed out. When I set the Field Render setting to “Upper Field First,” I can then select one of the five pattern options for the pulldown.

    So, my question is, how can I achieve the pulldown without having interlaced video?

    I would appreciate your wisdom,

    Matt Wiggins

  • Homer Lee

    March 13, 2011 at 1:23 pm

    hi Jeremy,

    i was wondering if your compressor process would work in this situation: i got a QT file that’s 1080p24 ProRes & i would like to convert it to HDV 1080i60.

    i’ve ran a couple of tests but would always get(not sure the proper term) a double frame-blending, ghosting type look every 4th & 5th frame(especially during motion) – is that what i’m supposed to be getting?

    i can give more details if this is possible to do w/o issues as this will be going to broadcast.

    i posted this issue a little earlier, but came across your post & wanted ask your opinion.

    thank you & i appreciate your time.

  • Daniel Stone

    March 13, 2011 at 4:06 pm

    One thing I found out is that you have to look at the interlaced version on a broadcast monitor to see if it’s right. Watching it in QuickTime on your machine makes it look jumpy and jerky (with that interlaced ghosting you’re talking about).

    Hope this helps.

  • Jeremy Garchow

    March 14, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    [Homer Lee] “i’ve ran a couple of tests but would always get(not sure the proper term) a double frame-blending, ghosting type look every 4th & 5th frame(especially during motion) – is that what i’m supposed to be getting?”

    It’s hard to tell without looking at it, but that does sort of fit the description for 3:2 pulldown. You should see 2 interlaced frame, then 3 progressive frames. If you post a second of full resolution video, I will happily check it on a monitor for you which is truly the only way to ensure it worked properly.

    Jeremy

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy