-
Poor performance out of a kick ass system
Hi guys,
my first post in this part of the forum , and I am little puzzled.
So far I only had the pleasure setting up Mac systems, now I am dealing with a PC and its the usual horror .
The thing is, this system is supposed to be really really good.
Its a GlobalStor with plenty of PSU power, 24 disks two Areca controllers and a Quadro6000 with SDI.
Its our Scratch workstation and so far its running fine.
So we bought a Quadro 600 for the main display.
I put that and use the Quadro6000 as GPU….bummer….the results are like using a Quadro4000
On CUDA Z I am getting around 1050 Gflops…as it should be.
So i now got a GTX 580 from Gainward with 3 gig to test that.
Same story .. Candle test gives me 5 !! nodes before the speed drops.
Thats 2 nodes more than the 6000 and less than I have on my Mac with 120/470 cards.So a question for the people using cross platform systems.
What to expect ?
I can clearly see the 580 is like 60% faster than the Quadro6000 , in spite of it being mentioned the other way round in the config guide.But still the performance is far from being usable in a feature production.
Could the Quadro 600 be the problem ?
We are thinking Cubix already, but first I would like to get to comparable results using on board possibilities.
So if anyone made a test with the same can in Mac AND Windows, please share.A slice of color…
DaVinci 8.2.1 OSX 10.7.2
MacPro 5.1 2×2,4 24GB
RAID0 8TB
GTX 470 / Quadro 4000
Extreme 3D+ICA Instructor
https://www.icolorist.com/Sascha.html