-
MaxxDigital ThunderShare experiences?
(Apologies for the cross-post from the LiftGammaGain forum. I’m just looking for feedback from a wide variety of users, so I’m looking forward to your responses…)
Anyone have any experience with the MaxxDigital ThunderShare “shared Thunderbolt” storage over 10g system?
https://www.maxxdigital.com/thundershare
I know Maxx is a well regarded company in our circles (I can’t imagine Bob Z would endorse a company that has been known to sell snake-oil, after all), but I’m kind of shocked that after over 2 years on the market, there seems to be almost no information or reviews from people who are actively using it in real world post-production environments.
I work for a very small post house (with 4 Mac workstations: 2 offline editorial/mogfx, 1 editorial assistant and 1 finishing/vfx/color) and we already have 10g Ethernet (optical fiber) wired in our facility. Our current 10g NAS “solution” quite frankly sucks, and after considering more pricey–yet very attractive–options like ProMax Platform & Terrablock, the ThunderShare system started to make more sense for us, since the ability to instantly scale the storage simply by plugging in another Thunderbolt drive is something we often wish we could do with our crappy Netgear ReadyNAS 4200 and GS752TXS switch.
We are primarily a commercial/TVC facility, but we also do non broadcast longform and the occasional feature-length film. Most of the footage we commonly work with are ProRes (HQ and 4444) and RED .r3d, both at 4k and higher resolution. The vast majority of the time, we are working and mastering out of 1080p23.98 sequences, even though we still offline and finish with the native raw media without transcoding (in Premiere Pro and Resolve).
My main concerns are obviously both sustained throughput and latency when 4 people are accessing 4K+ media at the same time, or simultaneously reading and writing to the RAID at the same time. Our current setup just turns to molasses when everyone is working, and only a reboot of the switch and/or NAS will return the network performance to useable speeds, although that is a temporary solution. We’ve actually resorted to using locally attached RAIDs to copy/sync footage from the NAS so that we are working on the media locally…then sync any newly created local media back to the NAS…like a bunch of goddamned Neanderthals.
Everything about this system makes total sense to me (even though it still seems like a “hack”), but it doesn’t instill a lot of confidence in me to find a total lack of user feedback about it–good or bad–when I do extensive Google searches for them.
I guess I’m paranoid about being burned again on a pricey, theoretical NAS “solution” that doesn’t hold up to real-world usage. Can anyone prove me wrong on this?