-
Main Concept H.264 vs. Apple H.264 on Video with 15 Frame Fade to Black
I normally use Compressor and Apple’s H.264 implementation or DV Kitchen with the x.264 encoder for creating H.264s.
I was drawn to Sorenson for some very specific FLV and WMV encoding needs and have since learned about the Main Concept H.264 encoder.
I’ve heard that it’s a better (more efficient) encoder than Apple’s, at least according to Jan Ozer, who I found some links to on the COW forums.
I assume that it’s a case of certain implementations have different strengths and weaknesses, but I would like get some opinions.
I’m encoding a video for web with the following specs:
- H.264 encoder
- MP4 container
- 640×360
- Multi-Pass encoding
- Data Rate: 1000Kbps
- Key frame every 100 and auto on scene changes
- High profile
- “Best” encoding effort
- B-Frames at 3
- CABAC Encoding on
The encode looks great until the end when there is a 15 frame fade to black. The spot closes on an wide aerial shot showing lots of trees. The picture starts to degrade heavily just a few frames before the fade begins.
Is the Main Concept encoder known to have a weakness encoding either areas of high detail or slow fades? I realize that’s difficult for any encoder, but are there known shortcomings of this encoder? I like having all the additional features it offers, but regret that Apple’s version has produced a clean result this time around.
-Andrew Saliga
Steelehouse Productions
http://www.steelehouse.com (undergoing a much-needed redesign)
http://www.vimeo.com/steelehouse