Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Mac Pro 2019 Benchmarks
-
Mac Pro 2019 Benchmarks
Posted by Tom Sefton on January 8, 2020 at 2:23 pmhttps://barefeats.com/mac-pro-2019-8k-deliver.html
Co-owner at Pollen Studio
http://www.pollenstudio.co.ukEric Santiago replied 6 years, 4 months ago 6 Members · 9 Replies -
9 Replies
-
Jeremy Garchow
January 8, 2020 at 5:06 pm“Though the dual Radeon VIIs (along with the Pro Vega II Duo) was the fastest setup, the VII fans go crazy if you put the Mac Pro to sleep. But sleep is overrated. We’ve got work to do.”
-
Tom Sefton
January 8, 2020 at 7:33 pm -
Eric Santiago
January 9, 2020 at 2:28 pmI have to do a quick case study on the advantages between the 2013 Mac Pro D700s vs 2019.
Basically a simple document for the upper foreheads to read.
Have to justify replacing two D700s/64GB RAM.
Typical corporate/government dribble.
Any decent articles out there?
I sent links to the fan sites, but not sure if any of that will fly. -
Tom Sefton
January 9, 2020 at 7:06 pmThis article? If it’s 5x faster than a top spec iMac Pro it’s going to be many moons better than a 2013 with red footage. Plus it’s all upgradeable
Co-owner at Pollen Studio
http://www.pollenstudio.co.uk -
Erik Lindahl
January 9, 2020 at 8:03 pmI’ve been looking for similar tests. A lot of people compare the Mac Pro 2019 to Frankenstein 2012 versions. What I’ve gathered with a simple Resolve test is:
MP 2013 12 Core, D700s, 128GB vs Mac Pro 2019 16 Core, Vega II Duo, 96 GB.
66 Blur Nodes
6fps vs 36fps (6X)6 TNR Nodes
4fps vs 28fps (7X)On top of the above you’ll have a very hard time with 4-8K material on the 2013 Machine, as in it might not even render.
For storage, the 2019 machine could have NVMe drives pulling 8GB /s or roughly 2.5 GB/s over TB3.
The 2013 machine would on a good day hold 1GB / s. The new machine would easily hold 2-8X the speed here.
-
Joe Marler
January 9, 2020 at 9:10 pm[Eric Santiago] “I have to do a quick case study on the advantages between the 2013 Mac Pro D700s vs 2019.”
Any new Mac will be vastly faster at H.264/HEVC codecs, since the 2013 trash can doesn’t have hardware acceleration. Those aren’t editing codecs but you often must handle those for ingest.
The GPU horsepower of the new Mac Pro isn’t just for VFX work. If your workflow involves GPU-intensive plugins like Neat Video (or similar Resolve tasks), it can make a big difference.
-
Oliver Peters
January 15, 2020 at 2:40 pmMax’s thoughts 3 weeks later
– Oliver
Oliver Peters – oliverpeters.com
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up