Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Apple Final Cut Pro Legacy HDMI Capture with HDV Deck Control?

  • HDMI Capture with HDV Deck Control?

    Posted by Ted Griffis on February 21, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    Hello all,

    Trying to bring in some HDV footage originally shot on the Canon XLH1 at the 24f setting.
    I have a Black Magic Intensity Pro a Canon HV20 (which supports the 24f material) and I’m trying to capture via HDMI to ProResHQ at 23.98. I want to do this with deck control, Black Magic say it can be done.
    When I get the Audio/Video settings set up “correctly” with Device Control: HDV Firewire Basic NDF, and Capture Preset: 1920×1080 ProResHQ, I open Log and Capture at which point the notice comes up:

    “To Capture HDV source material, both the Capture and Device control presets must be configured for HDV; otherwise, to capture in another format, both must NOT be configured for HDV”

    Is there any way of overriding this? Any other tricks out there? I’m trying to get material in for a doc film and I need to be able to have reliable or at least somewhat reliable TC.

    There is said to be some (though minor realizing its already compressed) quality gained by capturing via HDMI, which was the reason for going this route initially, but only if I can have TC.

    Are there any user experiences with this? Any ideas short of abandoning this workflow and buying a Convergent design HDV to HD-SDI box and a Kona card?

    Your advice is greatly appreciated.
    Ted

    MacPro 8core 2.8 (early 2008) 8 gig RAM, CalDigit HDPro 6TB
    OSX 10.5.1, FCP 6.0.2, QT 7.1.4

    Ted Griffis
    GriffisART
    https://www.griffisart.com

    Uli Plank replied 18 years, 2 months ago 6 Members · 13 Replies
  • 13 Replies
  • Michael Gissing

    February 21, 2008 at 9:20 pm

    I have successfully captured uncompressed off the Canon H1 with a Decklink HD Pro SDI card.

    The trick was to start with an Uncompressed setup and then change the device control to DV – not HDV. On the Canon I set it downconvert via ilink which gave me frame accurate machine control but the HD SDI out was uncompressed 1920 x 1080. The difference for you is that you are using a slightly different card and capturing ProRes via HDMI.

    My current workflow is to capture HDV via firewire and render ProRes. This saves a load of drive space and still looks great. I changed largely because many clients were capturing rushes as HDV and it seemed silly to recapture when the ProRes render option became available.

  • David Roth weiss

    February 21, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    The question you have to ask yourself is, is your video so absolutely pristine and your monitoring so perfect that you need to bother with this for even one second?

    Search for the threads regarding capturing to Pro Res on the fly via firewire and be done with it.

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.

  • Ted Griffis

    February 21, 2008 at 10:40 pm

    Thank you both for your replies. I was able to get deice control but having other issues with pulldown and starting to re-think approach.

    I’ve seen the posts on ProRes on the fly, and just tried of bit of it myself. The only problem I have with going this route is not being able to reconnect if need be with the source tapes as it appears that you do not have that flexibility if you go this route. Or am I wrong?

    I’m trying to get the content of this film in once, at the highest quality possible (short of uncompressed) so that there is not a need to re-digitize for finishing, however that being said, even with an awesome raid5 setup, things go wrong within production and computing and having a backup is a must for this film. A timecoded backup on tape that you can re-load from seems like the obvious choice, or is that out the window with HDV.

    I don’t have a whole lot of experience with HDV as most of my clients are working in DVCProHD or better. How are people handling backups when working with this material? Digital?

    thanks for the help, cheers,
    Ted

    Ted Griffis
    GriffisART
    https://www.griffisart.com

  • Michael Gissing

    February 21, 2008 at 11:01 pm

    [Ted Griffis] “The only problem I have with going this route is not being able to reconnect if need be with the source tapes as it appears that you do not have that flexibility if you go this route. Or am I wrong?”

    Yes you are wrong. If you have device control then the timecode on tape is accurate if you need to reload. The master tapes are your backup if the RAID gives you grief.

    I hope your job is small or your RAID is absolutely huge because capturing rushes even in ProRes needs a lot of space.

    I would recommend you capture as HDV via firewire and render your final edit in ProRes. Even if you want to recapture your final edit later, then using firewire as a device control and capturing as HDV is frame accurate. I have recaptured many HDV docos and the only sync trouble has been due to editors ignoring real timecode breaks, so capture carefully – as if it were any other tape format.

    Others may have alternate workflows.

  • David Roth weiss

    February 21, 2008 at 11:03 pm

    HDV, because of its use of so called long GOP MPEG encoding does have certain limitations with regard to accurate recapture, but its doable and not a deal breaker. However, as most of know, FCP isn’t in itself perfect in that regard anyway, and so I’m with you on avoiding the offline/online scenario whenever possible. That being said, capturing HDV via firewire to Pro Res on the fly has no inherent issues with as you say, “reconnecting with the source tapes,” other thena the same issues that any other method might, short of having to log in the reel number after capturing.

    David Roth Weiss
    Director/Editor
    David Weiss Productions, Inc.
    Los Angeles

    POST-PRODUCTION WITHOUT THE USUAL INSANITY ™

    A forum host of Creative COW’s Business & Marketing, and Indie Film & Documentary forums.

  • Ted Griffis

    February 21, 2008 at 11:38 pm

    Thanks guys, very helpful. I’ll let you know how it works out.

    cheers,
    Ted

    Maybe a little off topic from this post, but I’m curious if anyone out there using the Convergent Design HD Connect SI or LE has any thoughts regarding quality difference and workflow on “HDV to ProRes via Firewire” VS “HDV to HD Connect SI {or} LE (HDSDI).

    Ted Griffis
    GriffisART
    https://www.griffisart.com

  • Chris Poisson

    February 22, 2008 at 12:02 am

    Ted,

    Take a look at the HDMI box from Convergent Design. I believe it gives you control via FW, but I don’t know if you can capture to ProRes even with your rig, but I could be wrong.

    Have a wonderful day.

  • Michael Gissing

    February 22, 2008 at 1:26 am

    [David Roth Weiss] “HDV, because of its use of so called long GOP MPEG encoding does have certain limitations with regard to accurate recapture”

    The last HDV doco I recaptured was digitised on an AVID, Automatic Duck to FCP and then recapture of over 1100 edits, every one of them frame accurate. I don’t believe for a minute that it has anything to do with GOP structure as I have done the same process with DV downconverted edits, recaptured as HD uncompressed. I have actually had more errors recapturing HDCam but no-one says it has anything to do with that codec. Again they are nearly always operator error on the original capture.

    I have tried this many times and many ways and I can tell you that it is as accurate as operator error allows. I am yet to find a case that wasn’t operator error in HDV. That’s over the last ten HDV docs that I have recaptured, probably in the order of 7,000 cuts.

    I heard the same mantra in the early days of DV so forgive me if I don’t agree.

  • Ted Griffis

    February 22, 2008 at 1:52 am

    Thanks Chris, I miss the desert. (a Tucson native held captive in the north east)

    The HDV to ProRes on the fly workflow is really cool, its limitation that I can see is the re-batch-capturing those clips if things fail. A convergent design box and a new capture card like a Kona or and IoHD I think is the way to go on this. The Black Magic Intensity card that I have now was purchased initially as an interim solution for monitoring. Its clear now that its time to make the jump.

    Ted Griffis
    GriffisART
    https://www.griffisart.com

  • Michael Gissing

    February 22, 2008 at 2:01 am

    [Ted Griffis] “The HDV to ProRes on the fly workflow is really cool, its limitation that I can see is the re-batch-capturing those clips if things fail.”

    Sorry to harp on Ted but there is no reason why you can’t recapture again frame accurate with that workflow if you have device control via firewire. Why is it a limitation?

    My 2 cents worth? Why transcode to ProRes and then after grading etc render again to ProRes. That is one more transcoding than capture as HDV native and render the final to ProRes. More space, less effort on your drives and one less transcode. If someone can give me a reason why my logic is wrong then please – fire away.

Page 1 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy