Activity › Forums › Creative Community Conversations › Editor Numbers
-
Editor Numbers
Posted by Franz Bieberkopf on May 14, 2014 at 11:29 pmU.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics 10 year view (American-centric, obviously, 2012-2022 projections):
28,100 Editors nationally in 2012, projected to be 28,300 by 2022 (less than 1% growth over 10 years).
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/media-and-communication/film-and-video-editors-and-camera-operators.htm#tab-6
via PremiumBeat.com (listing average incomes of editors by state)
https://www.premiumbeat.com/blog/10-highest-and-lowest-paying-states-for-video-editors/Franz.
Brett Sherman replied 11 years, 12 months ago 9 Members · 10 Replies -
10 Replies
-
David Roth weiss
May 15, 2014 at 1:02 am[Franz Bieberkopf] “28,100 Editors nationally in 2012, projected to be 28,300 by 2022 (less than 1% growth over 10 years).”
Had Apple simply moved forward with FCP 8 as most editors truly desired, the projections for 2022 would probably be much, much higher, perhaps as maybe even as high as 28,450 editors. 🙂
A few years back the Wall Street Journal classified Post-Production as one of America’s Top-10 Dying Businesses, so it’s no great wonder that it’s growth might be miniscule over the coming years. Right?
-
Darren Roark
May 15, 2014 at 1:42 amDo those numbers deduct how many hours clients expect an editor nowadays to be a ‘colorist’, and an ‘audio sweetener’?
Those used to be completely separate jobs.
-
Shane Ross
May 15, 2014 at 1:53 amthat’s only feature film and TV editors. That number doesn’t take into account Corporate, news, wedding, specialty (realty), web…. VERY narrow list. It represents the 2% that is in features and broadcast.
Shane
Little Frog Post
Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def -
Charlie Austin
May 15, 2014 at 2:21 am[Shane Ross] “It represents the 2% that is in features and broadcast.”
But Shane… that 2% is all that matters! 🙂
***card carrying 2 percenter***
————————————————————-
~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~ -
Neil Goodman
May 15, 2014 at 3:23 ami dont think those salaries are accurate at all either. $ 53,000 for an editor in L.A.?
come on now.
-
Chris Harlan
May 15, 2014 at 6:26 am[Neil Goodman] “i dont think those salaries are accurate at all either. $ 53,000 for an editor in L.A.?
come on now.
“I know that’s the median, but they seem low to me too. Maybe, part-time freelance figures into it as well.
-
Franz Bieberkopf
May 15, 2014 at 2:33 pm[Shane Ross] “that’s only feature film and TV editors… It represents the 2% that is in features and broadcast.”
[Neil Goodman] “… i dont think those salaries are accurate at all either.”
[Chris Harlan] “… they seem low to me too.”
Edit: corrected per post below.
Franz.
-
Bill Dewald
May 15, 2014 at 7:03 pmThis is info for that “other” kind of editor – the “print” kind.
Suprised growth and wages aren’t much lower, the interns and commenters do all the editing now in print.
-
Franz Bieberkopf
May 15, 2014 at 8:43 pm[Bill Dewald] ” This is info for that “other” kind of editor”
Bill,
Thanks, yes, true. Removed above.
First post still correct.
Franz.
-
Brett Sherman
May 16, 2014 at 2:29 pmIt could also be a changing environment for job descriptions also. 10 years ago I would have called myself an editor. Today, not so much. I go with the over-arching term “Video Producer”. It’s the only thing I could come up with that encompasses everything I do.
Reply to this Discussion! Login or Sign Up