Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

  • David Roth weiss

    May 15, 2014 at 1:02 am

    [Franz Bieberkopf] “28,100 Editors nationally in 2012, projected to be 28,300 by 2022 (less than 1% growth over 10 years).”

    Had Apple simply moved forward with FCP 8 as most editors truly desired, the projections for 2022 would probably be much, much higher, perhaps as maybe even as high as 28,450 editors. 🙂

    A few years back the Wall Street Journal classified Post-Production as one of America’s Top-10 Dying Businesses, so it’s no great wonder that it’s growth might be miniscule over the coming years. Right?

  • Darren Roark

    May 15, 2014 at 1:42 am

    Do those numbers deduct how many hours clients expect an editor nowadays to be a ‘colorist’, and an ‘audio sweetener’?

    Those used to be completely separate jobs.

  • Shane Ross

    May 15, 2014 at 1:53 am

    that’s only feature film and TV editors. That number doesn’t take into account Corporate, news, wedding, specialty (realty), web…. VERY narrow list. It represents the 2% that is in features and broadcast.

    Shane
    Little Frog Post
    Read my blog, Little Frog in High Def

  • Charlie Austin

    May 15, 2014 at 2:21 am

    [Shane Ross] “It represents the 2% that is in features and broadcast.”

    But Shane… that 2% is all that matters! 🙂

    ***card carrying 2 percenter***

    ————————————————————-

    ~ My FCPX Babbling blog ~
    ~”It is a poor craftsman who blames his tools.”~
    ~”The function you just attempted is not yet implemented”~

  • Neil Goodman

    May 15, 2014 at 3:23 am

    i dont think those salaries are accurate at all either. $ 53,000 for an editor in L.A.?

    come on now.

  • Chris Harlan

    May 15, 2014 at 6:26 am

    [Neil Goodman] “i dont think those salaries are accurate at all either. $ 53,000 for an editor in L.A.?

    come on now.

    I know that’s the median, but they seem low to me too. Maybe, part-time freelance figures into it as well.

  • Franz Bieberkopf

    May 15, 2014 at 2:33 pm

    [Shane Ross] “that’s only feature film and TV editors… It represents the 2% that is in features and broadcast.”

    [Neil Goodman] “… i dont think those salaries are accurate at all either.”

    [Chris Harlan] “… they seem low to me too.”

    Edit: corrected per post below.

    https://www.bls.gov/ooh/media-and-communication/film-and-video-editors-and-camera-operators.htm#tab-7

    Franz.

  • Bill Dewald

    May 15, 2014 at 7:03 pm

    This is info for that “other” kind of editor – the “print” kind.

    Suprised growth and wages aren’t much lower, the interns and commenters do all the editing now in print.

  • Franz Bieberkopf

    May 15, 2014 at 8:43 pm

    [Bill Dewald] ” This is info for that “other” kind of editor”

    Bill,

    Thanks, yes, true. Removed above.

    First post still correct.

    Franz.

  • Brett Sherman

    May 16, 2014 at 2:29 pm

    It could also be a changing environment for job descriptions also. 10 years ago I would have called myself an editor. Today, not so much. I go with the over-arching term “Video Producer”. It’s the only thing I could come up with that encompasses everything I do.

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy