Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Adobe Premiere Pro Changing my RAID for better performance – A question

  • Changing my RAID for better performance – A question

    Posted by Darren Kelly on August 6, 2013 at 2:40 am

    Hello,

    I’ve been away for a while. Now, I’m back at the game, and I have a question.

    I am having some speed/performance issues with my Premiere Pro CS6 system. To describe it:

    GA-990FXA-UD3
    AMD FX 8150 Eight-Core Processor @ 3.6GHz
    16GB RAM
    Nvidia GTX570 – all the latest drivers
    Black Magic Decklink Intensity Pro – all the latest drivers
    Samsung SSD 840 250GB system disk
    WIndows 7 Home 64bit – all the latest drivers

    6TB Raid 0 using 2 Hitachi 3TB, 7200rpm drives with 64mb of Cache.

    Some other drives for storage of photos, and other files.

    My windows Experience index is 7.6, with the RAM and processor being tied. The other settings are at 7.9

    I am getting read/ write speeds of about 270mb/s on the raid. It is not fast enough to comfortably play the 1080p 60fps I record from my GoPro when I am doing aerial work, and causing generally slow performance with multiple layers in Premere CS6.

    I am considering increasing the number of drives in the raid from 2 to 4. Still striping as a RAID 0. It would give me a RAID 0 that would format out to about 11TB, but it is the speed I am interested in. The new drives will run me $119.00 each, and I’ll buy a cheap controller card to put a couple of data drives on

    Now to my questions:

    1. The new drives will NOT be the same brand as the current ones. They will be Segate drives with the same specs. Is this an issue? Here is the part number, etc:
    Seagate Barracuda 3TB 3.5″ SATA3 64MB Cache OEM Hard Drive (ST3000DM001)

    2. What speed boost can I expect?

    3. If I bought a 3rd drive – to make 5 in all, should I do a RAID 3 for redundancy and protection.

    I know I will have to blow out the current RAID, and I am backing up those files right now. I want to use the onboard controller on the MB to do this. I can’t afford an expensive RAID card at this point.

    Can anyone comment on my plans, tell me if I am making a critical mistake, or what you would do differently.

    Thanks all!

    Darren

    Tim Jones replied 12 years, 9 months ago 3 Members · 4 Replies
  • 4 Replies
  • Angelo Lorenzo

    August 6, 2013 at 4:20 am

    1) Not usually, although any difference in performance speed may lead to uneven read speeds as bytes are read from a slower drive vs a faster drive.

    2) Depends on the configuration, number of drives you end up with, the interface card and the connection used to your card/motherboard.

    3) RAID 3 is not used much in practice, I suggest RAID 5 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID#RAID_5 beneath this is a chart to calculate usable RAID size and read/write performance

    60 FPS h.264 footage doesn’t really spark a concern with me in terms of hard drive speed; some other issue/bottleneck may be afoot. Have you looked at Task Manager’s performance monitors when playing back footage to see what spikes?

    ——————–
    Angelo Lorenzo

    Need to encode ProRes on your Windows PC?
    Introducing ProRes Helper, an awesome little app that makes it possible
    Fallen Empire Digital Production Services – Los Angeles
    RED transcoding, on-set DIT, and RED Epic rental services
    Fallen Empire – The Blog
    A blog dedicated to filmmaking, the RED workflow, and DIT tips and tricks
    Can your post production question fit in a tweet? Follow me on Twitter

  • Tim Jones

    August 6, 2013 at 3:58 pm

    1. The new drives will NOT be the same brand as the current ones. They will be Segate drives with the same specs. Is this an issue? Here is the part number, etc:
    Seagate Barracuda 3TB 3.5″ SATA3 64MB Cache OEM Hard Drive (ST3000DM001)

    They will work, the system should resolve any minor size differences when you re-stripe them.

    2. What speed boost can I expect?

    You should see the speed of this type of configuration boost by the number of spindles, so 4 drives should give you approximately 4x the speed of one drive (or basically double what you’re seeing now)

    3. If I bought a 3rd drive – to make 5 in all, should I do a RAID 3 for redundancy and protection.

    You should never do RAID 3 for anything (that was only useful for older, very slow drives), but setting them up as RAID 5 would offer a single drive failure protection level that you don’t get with striping.

    With a 4 drive stripe on Windows 7 (Seagate Constellation 3 drives), I’m readily seeing 500MB/sec write and 550MB/sec read with media files. For even more fun, I’ve striped 6 512GB OCZ Vertex 450 SSDs and that is delivering 1.6GB/sec read and write 🙂 .

    Tim

    Tim Jones
    CTO – TOLIS Group, Inc.
    https://www.productionbackup.com
    BRU … because it’s the RESTORE that matters!

  • Darren Kelly

    August 7, 2013 at 12:39 am

    I did add the additional 2 drives to make a 4drive, 12TB RAID (Formats to 10.9 TB)

    Doing the Decklink speed test, I recorded the following results.

    2 Drive RAID

    Write: 270mbs
    Read: 285 mbs

    4 drive RAID
    Write: 485mbs
    Read: 585 mbs.

    The benchmark testing showed things to be slower, which doesn’t make much sense. I may have done it wrong.

    The next question?

    Will an independent RAID controller make a difference?

    Will moving to a RAID 5 by adding an additional drive give me the protection that 12TB require?

    WOW the performance of those SSD’s are making me jealous. How many streams can you playback in real time on the timeline?

    Do you use windows to RAID, or a hardware raid card?

    D

  • Tim Jones

    August 7, 2013 at 3:50 pm

    I believe that what you’re seeing for 4 drives is about right. Like I said, it’s “approximately” 4x the performance of a single spindle. There is a bit of overhead to slice and dice the data between the drives.

    Unless you’re also planning on moving to some serious number of drives (more than 6 or 8), a dedicated RAID card won’t really boost performance in RAID 0 (striped) mode on newer processors. However, for RAID 5, you’ll need to move to a dedicated HBA since the Windows software RAID options don’t include proper levels beyond concatenation, striping, and mirroring (JBOD, RAID-0, and RAID-1). I really prefer ATTO’s ExpressSAS R680 to the other brands that we tested.

    As for protection, while RAID 5 will help if one drive fails (and only if you’re paying attention and replace the failed drive immediately), you should NEVER consider RAID a replacement for backup.

    Of course, I’m spoiled since I work with LTO tape all of the time, so my ArGest SSD20 Cube has an LTO-6 drive for backup and long-term archival (of course, I use BRU, but there are other solutions for Windows) in addition to the SSD drives.

    For my personal Windows 7 PC, I use the ATTO ExpressSAS H680 and use Windows dynamic volumes in striped mode for the disks. As an aside, I was using a generic Adaptec SAS HBA, but the move to ATTO has improved stability and throughput to both the SSDs and the tape.

    This setup works great for me whether I’m using Adobe’s CS6/CC suite, Vegas, or just playing Starcraft :).

    Tim

    Tim Jones
    CTO – TOLIS Group, Inc.
    https://www.productionbackup.com
    BRU … because it’s the RESTORE that matters!

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy