Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 2
  • I notice no one here pointed out this guy was mostly complimentary about FCP and stated, in the end, “The winner, for me, remains the Media Composer, primarily, at this point, because of its trimming controls.” … “Final Cut does some things better than the Media Composer these days and those improvements, especially the ability to do really slick titles in Motion and sophisticated sound work in Soundtrack Pro, make it more and more interesting.”

    He was stating his personal preference and why. He NEVER slammed FCP.

  • Zach Cobb

    July 10, 2006 at 5:13 pm in reply to: Perplexing Panny 200 P2 Problem HEEELPP

    This is from the “Read Me” for Xpress Pro 5.5.1:

    New Feature Descriptions for Macintosh Editing Application:

    Support for Panasonic P2 The Avid editing application now supports the
    Panasonic

  • Zach Cobb

    June 25, 2006 at 3:16 pm in reply to: HVX 200 Viewfinder

    Or, as one SFWB to a SWB: High Heel Sneakers!!!

  • Zach Cobb

    April 25, 2006 at 10:00 pm in reply to: Just got back from NAB

    The software MC is $4995, not $7000. The $7000 figure is a low round-off for MC and MOJO SDI ($2495), which is ~$7500 for the two.

  • Zach Cobb

    January 14, 2006 at 3:21 pm in reply to: Avid vs. Final Cut

    With the caveat that Apple is in a major pardigm shift from Power PC to Intel:

    IF you have other apps that need a Mac to run AND your Avid software is not of the HD flavor, you can have your Mac and Avid too! FCP is an excellent application, but different from Avid. There are pluses and minuses for each. If you set your Mac with dual-boot partitions, you can have both apps installed and decide which you prefer.

    As part of the caveat mentioned above, don’t expect Apple to update/support the Power PC apps for long after the Intel Macs are fully in swing.

Page 2 of 2

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy