Hello again, Joe Clay (and everyone else looking into this discussion),
So I’ve prepared the test project. And I went ahead and tested it fully myself, and for the sake of thoroughness I also tested out the project in my old, rickety 3-year-old HP ENVY dv4 with 12Gb RAM, which is the PC I’ve been editing on up to know, and is definitely on its last legs: program crashes at least twice during every edit session, slow, slow, slow while editing… but… sadly, I guess, because I’ve just spent 2569 euro, it did better than the new MBP at rendering and exporting. Is it an understatement to say I’m underwhelmed? Don’t get me wrong, it does out-perform my old, rickety PC in many, many things… but for 3-times the price I would expect faster rendering and exporting.
Anyway, these are the facts:
Small clip worked on AE of 2560 x 1440 footage off a GoPro-ish camera. Added a black solid and CC Rainfall. Then imported into PP, changed the speed to 2000% and applied Frame Blending. That’s all. So in the end, it’s a 154-frame comp, 5:04 seconds. I tried the exact same project on both computer and both media exports where at my normal settings, that is: 1080p, 29,97 fps, VBR 2 Pass, Target and Max bitrates 25 Mbps. The results:
Brand-new MBPro with 16Gb RAM:
- Timeline render: 7:45 minutes
- Media export: (100% and completely ready) 16:47
Old, rickety PC:
- Timeline render: 6:50 minutes
- Media export: (100% and completely ready) 13:23
Is it fair to say I feel ripped off? Or did I get a lemon? I’m sort of stuck with a Mac now, so should I return this one and get the one with the AMD Radeon graphics included? Will it make a real difference or are these the rendering/exporting times I’m to expect?
Well, here’s the link to the trial project: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/frbpuzo0noshve5/AAD-OqKw5DZXpas6WmJK2_Rta?dl=0
Thanks again for all your help!