Forum Replies Created

Page 53 of 70
  • Tony West

    May 1, 2012 at 4:15 pm in reply to: Backup

    [Kevin Patrick] “I guess I’ll stick to my duplicate projects process.”

    I will keep backing up also.

    I thought it was interesting to watch though. It wasn’t theory, he opened up the file and destroyed it.

    Then he recovered the file.

    I’m tempted to try it with a test file.

    Either way I feel a little better about it now. If I’m backing up and it’s backing up I like my odds a little better.

  • Tony West

    May 1, 2012 at 12:34 pm in reply to: Backup

    [Jason Porthouse] “I’d simply copy the backup file into a backups folder”

    This looks like a good habit Jason.

  • [Aindreas Gallagher] “my own question would be whether editing practitioners require (or asked) anyone to provide them with such an unannounced sandblasting?”

    Even as one who enjoys using X I really enjoy reading your post Aindreas. You are a smart dude and a crafty writer. You also make great points.

    This annoyed me like many others at first.

    While I like the favorites and the option to add multiple in’s and out’s, like many editors I like to avoid adding keystrokes if I don’t have to. (hitting F all the time)

    X will remember the I and O as long as you don’t “click” on another source clip. (or within that source clip)

    Since I know it acts this way I avoid doing that and use the skimmer if I want to look at another source clip after I have made a selection. (that’s the beauty of the skimmer. Not as much clicking)

    Once I have made an I and O I drop that clip in the timeline and it’s easy for me to change the I and O from there. It’s not going anywhere once it’s in the TL.

    When I would try to change the in and out in the source window that’s when the frustration came in.

    It’s kind of hard for me to explain it but since I have been working this way the muscle memory has taken over and I don’t even think about it anymore.

    This is not to say people should do it this way or right or wrong.

    The more I use this program the more comfortable I feel with it.

    I just wanted to share my personal story on this issue.

  • Tony West

    April 25, 2012 at 10:35 pm in reply to: A Question for Working Professional Editors Using FCPX.

    [Oliver Peters] “Coke vs. Pepsi example, if I don’t want competing clients accidentally exposed to a competitor’s timeline or event content,”

    This seems to be a big problem for many here, and I get it.

    I’m just glad I don’t have to worry about it.

    Everybody I work with knows I’m working for everybody in town (so are most in a town like this : )

    I think that’s part of the reason they want me. Because I’m wanted hehehe

    It’s like that girl that doesn’t want you, until another girl is looking at you.

    Or like our Arena. Toyota knows they don’t have a lock on this building. They got spots at the game and here comes another ride rolling in.

    I don’t show up on the FOX game wearing an ESPN shirt out of respect, but they know the deal.

    I’m an independent.

    It’s not going to stop me from using the program.

  • Tony West

    April 23, 2012 at 12:27 pm in reply to: Clips coming over as black on timeline

    Sorry Matt, I didn’t explain that well.

    What I meant to say was, I’m not really certain it’s “not” a bug. I’m not really sure what it is. I would need to see it happen again.

  • Tony West

    April 22, 2012 at 10:57 pm in reply to: Clips coming over as black on timeline

    I saw this weird deal also Matt.

    I thought it was a bug. Never saw it before the last update.

    I think I toggled between enable by selecting the black clip and hitting the v key and got it to come back.

    I have not been able to repeat it to narrow it down.

  • I meant to comment on your post also Bret, that you had some good points, just got too busy.

    For people who what to say, edit with tracks, Avid and Prp have to share those people.

    If you want that apple way, only they have have it and you have to buy their computer to do it.

  • It’s a nice post Tim.

    I have thought from the beginning that Apple did exactly what they were trying to do.

    Which was to simplify Pro editing.

  • Tony West

    April 20, 2012 at 8:18 pm in reply to: Editor’s Dilema

    [Andrew Kimery] “The entire industry has become too broad to paint with broad strokes.”

    Andrew, brilliant.

    Also I like how you put porn in there. That was very funny (and true : )

    Waaayyyyy too many people cutting way too many things to get a handle on it.

  • Tony West

    April 20, 2012 at 12:58 pm in reply to: One year later…

    [Mark Raudonis] ” It’s NOT personal. It’s business.”

    It’s business for me to.

    The odds seemed stacked a year ago and they seem even more stacked now.

    Apple can afford to give edit software away for free. That’s tough to compete with if you can’t do the same.

    It would be like AT&T saying that they are going to start editing for people for 20 bucks.

    They would still do their phone crap, but just jump in our mix also. That would be bad for me.

    It seems like AVID needs to blow the doors off fc to stay, and I don’t see them doing that.

Page 53 of 70

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy