Tony West
Forum Replies Created
-
[Andy Field] “NLE without connecting, un-connecting,”
I never really saw connected clips as that different from tracks from the beginning.
The basic rule is the same. You are stacking clips above and below. It’s not like all of the sudden to font somebody you are putting it below instead of on top.
I see those connected clips as “tracks” with more flexibility.
[Andy Field] “They’re Apple. They know what’s best.”
This part seems unrealistic to me. It seems to imply that people would be loyal to something (other than themselves and their direct family) over their own personal comfort.
I find that premise hard to believe.
-
[Joshua Pearson] “like cut a piece of room tone in over an off-camera cough or interviewer voice”
What about just range the section with the cough and drop that level down and then attach your room tone below that (as a connected clip) with a little adjustments with the audio fade handles? I love those fade handles.
-
[Oliver Peters] ” but rather two smaller segments that are part of a longer show, for example, show segment 1 and segment 2. Editors working on TV show productions, like reality TV, do this all the time. And it’s not just two editors, but often multiple editors.”
Yeah, I know all that.
That’s not how it was explained at first.
Then later it got corrected.
-
[Bret Williams] “The paid version of Resolve 11 if going to allow multiple users to edit the same timeline at the same time.”
Is that something that you see yourself doing?
Do you picture yourself working as an editor with another editor working on the same section at the same time as you?
It seems confusing to me. Would the director or producer be talking to both of you at the same time? Just trying to figure out how many people would use that and how it would work so you are not stepping on each other.
-
[Richard Herd] “I can think of two types of collaborative workflow.
The hard one to do is the Isis working on the same assets simultaneously workflow like reality tv.
The easy one is duplicated assets, checking in, checking out, versioning and so on.
It appears that has become the defining characteristic in this forum for pro: duplicated assets v. same assets.
What other workflows are collaborative?”
You make an interesting point Richard. I would like to see more discussion of this.
-
I’m kind of all over the board with my feelings on it.
First and for most I really like that music they picked : )
Music is so key for me and I really liked that track.
The odd thing is, I kind of liked that behind the scenes cut at the end better than the spot hehehe
I don’t know what happened here, but if the client told them, “hey I want you to shoot this with an iPhone and do the best you can with it to make it look professional”, I would say they got the most they could get out of that phone.
I don’t really see anybody going through that much trouble to shoot with a phone unless the client
said “do this” But I don’t really know what happened.I know I wouldn’t want to shoot with a phone but I would if somebody paid me to.
If I’m trying to showcase my car I think I would want to show it in color. There is beauty in color.
I bet those cars would look even better.There have been some good points on both sides made.
I don’t know what else to say : )
-
[Oliver Peters] ” Apple promotes 4K editing. The camera shoots 4K.”
Exactly, sounds like X will work just fine with their new camera and maybe they think it will also, regardless of any agreement they may have. Maybe they think others will to.
All I know is, if I’m another NLE, I would have liked to have seen my product in that ad.
-
[Oliver Peters] “[tony west] “They must think CION users may cut on X
That’s why they put it in that ad”I doubt it. AJA has a very tight relationship with Apple and a number of their products are and have been co-developed. They have also licensed ProRes for use in the camera by way of the KiPro technology. It’s in their interest to cross-promote Apple products, especially when Apple is making a big deal out of 4K. They certainly aren’t going to stick Resolve into the ad ;-)”
I don’t know O, I usually follow your logic on these threads but you lost me on this one.
They wanted to put a product in their ads for their new camera that they think nobody wants to use?
They don’t believe in X, but they decided to just stick that product in their ad?
Uh uh
-
[Oliver Peters] “A fraction of the amount of X users will ever come close to a CION.”
They must think CION users may cut on X
That’s why they put it in that ad
-
[Franz Bieberkopf] “[Marcus Moore] “… I think people have an over inflated sense of the size of our industry.”
Marcus,
Agreed. And this concedes the point that FCP X competes for users in “our industry”.”
I still think it’s interesting that manufactures think X competes for “our industry”
I keep seeing it in ads like this when they could have chose any other NLE
Who is the CION aimed at?
I think they know something
