Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 3
  • Tom Donnelly

    June 28, 2012 at 4:09 am in reply to: OT: Automated backup software for RAID

    Well, I already use it to back up main system drive – I was not aware that it can be set up to back up specific drives, and more than one instance, ie boot drive to a TM drive, and then RAID to an entirely diff drive.

    Can it?

  • Tom Donnelly

    June 27, 2012 at 4:55 pm in reply to: OT: Automated backup software for RAID

    Looks like that software is no longer supported as of 10.7 Lion.

    Anyone else?

    Tom

  • Thanks, guys, all very helpful info. The spots were encoded and delivered successfully. Just wanted to point out that the last 3-4 few replies in particular were instrumental in proper encoding for this particular workflow for those stumbling upon this post 3 years from now…a lot of the search results that I came up with before posting were not clear in their success, wanted to make sure that others with this issue know that this worked.

    And now, the best part – the final invoice!

  • Thanks, trying pulldown now.

    To confirm – I am frame rate to 29.97 in the PRHQ dialog box, set duration to 100% in Compressor, setting rate conversion to fast, deinterlace to fast/upper field first (staying 1920×1080), and also setting “interlaced” to “top field field” in the ProRes HQ-specific dialog box. This will provide correctly interlaced 29.97 footage, yes?

    What should I see different than the repeated fourth frame – a blended 5th one (field of each image?) or a split frame if I view fields in a 59.94 comp in After Effects for instance? I would like to be able to proof that it is done correctly…

    Thanks!

  • Thanks, that’s what I was resorting to, but if it’s the correct workflow than that makes me feel better.

    Follow-up question:

    Several of the stations that I am submitting to said that they would accept a progressive frame file for delivery, but if I introduce interlacing myself at this point, is there less chance that something they do, beynd my control, would make the image quality not look ideal for air? Or progressive/interlaced delivery is irrelevant?

  • Tom Donnelly

    September 3, 2009 at 1:49 am in reply to: OT: QT Pro “stuck” in kiosk mode?

    Grrrrrrrrr….

    Looks like this is Safari 4 bug. Firefox still working correctly.

    TD

  • Tom Donnelly

    June 19, 2009 at 5:28 pm in reply to: White Screen of Agony

    Do not have FCStudio 2 on that machine, using FCP 5. Thus, Compressor v.2.3. SO – cannot first transcode to ProRes, or I would be using that (this is actually for a co-worker at a different location than me – trying to find a decent editing codec for him since he does not have access to ProRes.)

    (Unless I’m mistaken – I know there’s a ProRes decoder available – is than an ENCODER as well for those without FCP Studio 2?)

    Exporting directly from QT to the AIC DOES work, which is why it not working in Compressor is such a mystery. All other formats coming out of Compressor work fine.

    He just tried MPEGStreamclip per your suggestion, and it appears to work, so MUST be a Compressor issue. He has already uninstalled and re-installed the entire FC Suite.

    Argh.

  • Tom Donnelly

    June 18, 2009 at 2:34 pm in reply to: White Screen of Agony

    Footage comes from a PC, Windows XP, Service Pack 3
    Encoded with FRAPS codec, decoded on Mac using Perian
    Attempted compression to Apple Intermediate Codec on Mac OS 10.4.11
    Compressor v. 2.3
    Quicktime v. 7.6.2

  • Tom Donnelly

    March 29, 2009 at 7:29 pm in reply to: NTSC display looks like jagged, single-field?

    One final thought – its almost as if the AJa IO LA is not capable of even passing through something as large a res as an HD signal (through any of the outputs…), and breaks it up before it hits the monitor – is this possible? As SD files, and outputting an SD sequence, seem to play crisp and fine to the CRT.

    TD

  • Tom Donnelly

    March 29, 2009 at 7:24 pm in reply to: NTSC display looks like jagged, single-field?

    Additionally, I opened an old SD sequence, filed dominance set to “none,” and full of frame-based animation. This stuff plays perfectly on the monitor.

    I pasted in all of the HD stuff, various codecs and resolutions (FCP auto-scaled that stuff to be the correct size to fit in the SD frame…) and that stuff played great there. I changed seq settings to make the seq an HD res, and then 1.) All of the HD stuff is suddenly small and I would have to go through sequence manually, increasing the size and changing the “distort” pan in the Motion tab for every clips and 2.) – when I do this to one clip just to see if it plays w/out the jaggies, no dice, jaggies still present…

    Double-argh.

    TD

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy