Forum Replies Created

Page 7 of 52
  • Toke

    March 11, 2006 at 1:44 am in reply to: Timelapse

    It’s not the best for timelapse, since it lacks the slow shutter speeds.

  • Toke

    March 9, 2006 at 8:31 pm in reply to: Will Panasonic have a solution for the noise

    Jan,
    can you tell what is the pixel size of dvx’s ccd?
    Same here in Europe?

  • Toke

    March 9, 2006 at 12:12 am in reply to: Will Panasonic have a solution for the noise

    Jan,
    the problem isn’t noise, it’s the “banding blocking” you’ll get with most of the settings in the darker areas of the picture. Block size is 8×8 pixels. There was very clear test made by Saru and lots of discussion in dvxuser about that.

    Do you have a comment on “banding blocks” or should we just glue our gamma setting to cine-d?

  • Toke

    March 7, 2006 at 8:42 pm in reply to: best pict quality/resolution for hvx 720 or 1080?

    [Steve Freebairn] “Actually in all reality you can do overcranking in 1080p, because you can shoot 1080 30P and then slow it down to 80% of the speed”

    And once again you can’t do this with more expensive European version.

  • Toke

    March 6, 2006 at 1:53 pm in reply to: Noise Reduction Firmware Upgrade?

    Saru made a really nice second round of tests ( https://www22.tok2.com/home/hvx200/index02.html ), that show that this “banding blockiness” is really bad with b-press and cine-v, but it is quite non-existent with cine-d. Cine-d has only normal (great looking, at this point) video noise in the underexposured area.

    Jan, do you have a comment on this test?
    Why there are these blocks, which clearly aren’t just video noise, with some gamma settings?
    Is there something wrong with these settings?
    Or some of them you just can’t use when you have dark areas in your frame?

  • Toke

    March 3, 2006 at 11:23 pm in reply to: Colored block error in P2 ingest

    Good to hear,
    please tell us the solution when you find it!

  • Toke

    March 3, 2006 at 11:20 pm in reply to: Workflow for archiving camera
  • Toke

    March 3, 2006 at 9:24 am in reply to: 24PN or 24p??

    [Shane Ross] “Many PC systems don’t work with QT files…and unless the system has the codec that you encoded as, it won’t work at all.”

    Do you really know a professional editing software for windows that does not have ability to import quicktime? This usually involves some conversion, but can be done.
    Quicktime7 contains a standard set of codecs, so your windows system has those codecs after you have installed qt7. With eg. After effects of QTpro you can also convert qt-mov’s to avi’s of your editing software’s native codec, if it refuses to understand qt at all.
    In real world mixing edit systems happens every day. That’s why we have EDL’s. Usually offline and online is not made with same system.

  • Toke

    March 3, 2006 at 12:53 am in reply to: Noise Reduction Firmware Upgrade?

    Hmmm, wasn’t hvx200’s firmware on non-upgradeble?
    https://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=193&postid=855891

  • Toke

    March 3, 2006 at 12:41 am in reply to: Let’s talk long term storage…

    Let’s see what year these holographic storages will really be on the market.
    One thing that is better with them than with massive hdd systems is that you can’t accidentally erase gigabytes of footage if you use write-once disks.

Page 7 of 52

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy