Forum Replies Created

Page 3 of 20
  • Toby Tomkins

    October 9, 2014 at 7:26 pm in reply to: Resolve 11 and tangent wave

    UPGRADE WAVE FIRMAWARE

  • Toby Tomkins

    October 2, 2014 at 10:30 am in reply to: DaVinci Resolve 11.1 released

    Great!

    Is there a full changes list anywhere?

  • Toby Tomkins

    September 19, 2014 at 1:04 pm in reply to: Davinci Resolve Rec709 Color Space

    In order to do that you will need to use a CMS (colour management system), profile the DaVinci GUI video display with a probe, create a calibration LUT, and then load the LUT in the resolve settings under GUI display lut.

  • Toby Tomkins

    August 22, 2014 at 7:12 am in reply to: Resolve 11 odd LUM qualifier behavior

    This is indeed terrible. The saturation scale isn’t great either.

    It would also be nice to be able to set ranges or have a log preset for these ranges.

  • Toby Tomkins

    August 20, 2014 at 3:19 pm in reply to: Multiple versions

    Use remote grading. See the manual.

  • Toby Tomkins

    August 19, 2014 at 7:47 pm in reply to: Noise Reduction/Color temp change problem

    Have you tried exporting a LUT of the grade look (no windows etc that won’t translate into a LUT) out of resolve and applying the LUT in AE to before/after noise reduction in AE? Then you can see if it is AE or Neat changing the look and troubleshoot from there.

  • Toby Tomkins

    July 24, 2014 at 9:32 pm in reply to: Subtitles in Resolve

    Glad to have helped!

  • Toby Tomkins

    July 24, 2014 at 10:55 am in reply to: Subtitles in Resolve

    There are xml subtitle import plugins for FCP, so you could go XML>FCP>XML>Resolve very easily…

  • Toby Tomkins

    July 24, 2014 at 10:54 am in reply to: Subtitles in Resolve

    You could create subtitles in FCP7 or FCPX on a video track and then simply export just the track with subtites as an XML and Resolve would import this XML and re-build the titles in a new timeline, which you could then copy and paste onto the timeline with the picture.

  • It’s not ideal as you have to set up and manage these other nodes, doubling your normal node count per qualification + 1 (the source with the LUT). If you have several qualifications that’s a lot of nodes all of a sudden!

    What would be really clever is a relative scale, using the relative min-max of HSL values that are in the source image. This relative relationship could also preserve qualifications to an extent if the key source node grade changes slightly (if you are qualifying downstream of a correction for whatever reason, maybe a pre-clip group grade changes for example!). That would be very nifty! What do you think Peter!?

Page 3 of 20

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy