Timothy Auld
Forum Replies Created
-
Because the film was released at a time of year that is generally regarded as a dumping ground does not have a whit to do with the efficiency of the workflow.
Tim
-
I get worked up when people tell me things that are not quantifiable.
Tim
-
I move audio and video together all the time without even thinking about it. What’s the big deal here? This guy can edit 2 to 3 times faster? Measured against what? This is completely marketing eyewash. No other way to characterize it.
Tim
-
Apple files for copyright when a receptionist sneezes.
Tim
-
Most NLE’s exist today are based on film workflows. When the memory of film workflows finally goes away then FCPX and others that will surely follow will rule the day. Organization is the key. That, and being able to easily provide deliverables, will rule the day and the future.
Tim
-
But they have done just that to so many applications with huge and happy user bases, so many times. The behavior is not at all out character.
Tim
-
As opposed to someone at Adobe?
Tim
-
I hope there is a livestream, and if not I hope you guys will post details here. Have fun.
Tim
-
FCPX suffers because it is a low earner in the Apple multiverse. Plain and simple.
Tim
-
I don’t think there is a single editor out there who will refuse to use FCPX. If someone offered me a good job and using FCPX was a deal breaker then I would accept in a second. Any good editor can make any NLE do what he/she needs it to do. The oft repeated myth that there is an Illuminati of editors out there who will reject working with X in any circumstance is just that: A myth. The market governs here.
Tim