Forum Replies Created

Page 96 of 426
  • Steve Connor

    January 22, 2016 at 7:52 pm in reply to: Back to FCPX From PP (Rant)

    [Bill Davis] ” It was NOT “broken” in any sense of the term”

    Maybe a little on one of the early versions when autosave wasn’t reliable and FCPX wasn’t very stable 🙂

  • Brilliant!

  • Steve Connor

    January 17, 2016 at 7:53 pm in reply to: Back to FCPX From PP (Rant)

    [Bob Woodhead] “just that every time it’s gone POOF on me, I’ve never lost a single edit. Never had to ditz around with prefs or files. Just relaunch, and there’s the last thing I was working on.”

    One of my favourite things about FCPX

  • Steve Connor

    January 16, 2016 at 7:34 pm in reply to: Back to FCPX From PP (Rant)

    [Lillian Young] “I do not want to go back to FCP X. It feels amateur after using Premiere”

    I think you may get a little heat for that statement.

  • Steve Connor

    January 6, 2016 at 8:15 pm in reply to: Fun challenge

    [Charlie Austin] “Well, the problem with that is that iMovie and FCP X are the same program with different UI’s now. Different features enabled/disabled, but the same code rune them both. 🙂
    “

    Fortunately the iMovie & “toy” comments don’t appear on here any more, although I still hear them from some Editors I talk to, usually people who haven’t even looked at it!

  • Steve Connor

    January 5, 2016 at 5:14 pm in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Scott Witthaus] “I use “chicklet” view often. But I would really like the ability to re-size the clips in this view like all the other views. Am i missing something?
    “

    No – you’re using it wrong 🙂

  • Steve Connor

    January 4, 2016 at 4:18 pm in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Tim Wilson] “I confess that I’ve not exactly finished building out the member profile feature set, and will be happy to take suggestions. Drop me a note offline if you have any ideas.

    “

    My suggestion is that you give yourself a hearty pat on the back for adding in such useful features 🙂

  • Steve Connor

    January 4, 2016 at 7:23 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Oliver Peters] “Are you incapable of engaging in a civil discussion? Why is it that your attitude is always confrontational?”

    Time to hit the imaginary “ignore” button?

  • Steve Connor

    January 4, 2016 at 6:56 am in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Robin S. Kurz] “Feel free to quote the part where I said anything even close to not having “ANY performance hits”.

    And… “Are you incapable of engaging in a civil discussion? Why is it that your attitude is always confrontational?”

    – RK”

    Shame, you have so much to contribute

  • Steve Connor

    January 3, 2016 at 10:59 pm in reply to: Precision Editor

    [Robin S. Kurz] “Because sorry, but if someone’s machine can’t work without some major performance hit in THAT setting either (from what I gather your only argument against using anything other option than “chicklet”?), then I’d say FCP or what horrible restrictions Apple has put on FCP’s options, are the very least of their worries. Seriously. In which case, yes, I guess FCP X clearly isn’t their best choice either. Oh well.”

    It’s lovely that you don’t get ANY performance hits, but a lot of people like myself and Oliver DO, are you saying FCPX isn’t the best choice for us?

    Because I get ZERO performance hit when I use filmstrips and waveforms in PPro, which suggests it’s an FCPX issue

Page 96 of 426

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy