Forum Replies Created

Page 2 of 6
  • fjhskfhsfkh

    Ok that’s it. Trying out PP CS5.5 right now. I hate you 🙁

  • Stefan Buhrmester

    June 26, 2011 at 2:31 am in reply to: To all the FCP-X Cry-Babies

    So instead of replying to that specific person, you create a new thread and accost everyone. Don’t want to know what’s going on in that brain of yours.

    [Aaron Cadieux] “”Wah! Wah! Apple’s going to make it easier for an ameature to do my job. Wah! Wah!”

    That’s what all you crybabies sound like

    I’m sorry to say that to you, but if you think that this is what the people on this forum complain about, you missed the point completely and your whole insult is baseless.

  • Stefan Buhrmester

    June 26, 2011 at 12:52 am in reply to: Ripple cut across al clips and story lines.

    I have no idea how can vertically ripple delete 🙁 Luckily I’ve never needed that.

    Creating multiple crossfades at once? No idea too 🙁

  • Stefan Buhrmester

    June 25, 2011 at 8:14 pm in reply to: Apple Employee’s Remark

    After you have spoken to said mysterious employee, what are your thoughts about the future direction of the product?

  • Stefan Buhrmester

    June 25, 2011 at 7:59 pm in reply to: Interesting Opinion…

    Well I do not believe that any company in the world has based it’s business on FCPX. If yes, then your pal is right, it’s dumb. I assumed he targeted anyone who based it’s business on one product, including well-established solutions like FCS.

  • Stefan Buhrmester

    June 25, 2011 at 7:15 pm in reply to: Interesting Opinion…

    So your attorney pal friend basically sais that whoever buys a product that is full of bugs and is proven to be falsely advertised and complains about this, is a dumbass? It’s people like this who make me angry and question the world.

    For the following part, the base of his argument chain is completely wrong. If a company invests and builds a business on a technology that is proven to work (FCS) there is nothing wrong about it. Apple can’t decide to just kill all the existing solutions. They still work and continue to work.

    I presume he wipes his butt with dollar bills, therefore I don’t believe he cares about moral obligations and similar unnecessary stuff.

  • Stefan Buhrmester

    June 25, 2011 at 6:52 pm in reply to: An Open Letter Apology – FCP X Fourm

    You’re right 🙂

    Hi Mom! Hi Google! Hi potential future client or employee 🙂

  • Guys, know what would be awesome?

    A training series titled “Honest FCPX training”. The teacher would constantly rant and bitch about the bugs and missing features in FCPX, heavily breathing every time he is confronted with one, and show workarounds for them, while concluding every episode with “man this sucks, I might also just go ahead an kill myself”.

  • Stefan Buhrmester

    June 25, 2011 at 6:19 pm in reply to: Quick Tipp: Extract and hold a single frame

    I cannot confirm your results.

    I created a 30fps timecode clip. Without retiming, everything is ok. 3 second mark in project shows 3 second mark in clip

    Now I added a hold frame at the 4 second mark. And the timing get’s f**ked up. Even before the actual hold.

    Maybe it depends on the footage. Anyway, I conclude that the retiming tools should NOT be used for real-world editing.

  • Well… A good teacher needs to be enthusiastic about the stuff that he teaches. A good teacher knows that and it’s common teaching practice to make yourself enthusiastic about something in order to be a better teacher. You want your training to be good in order for people to watch it.

    Imagine your trainer explains you something with an attitude like “Yeah that’s rubbish anyway, just kill yourself.” 😀

Page 2 of 6

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy