Forum Replies Created

  • Smoked Meat

    December 16, 2005 at 10:49 pm in reply to: 3rd party alternatives to FCP5’s “Basic 3D”

    Boy don’t I feel like an idiot! Thanks Todd. 🙂

    Splice Heist Inc.
    Toronto, ON

  • Smoked Meat

    December 16, 2005 at 9:42 pm in reply to: 3rd party alternatives to FCP5’s “Basic 3D”

    Thanks for your feedback, Todd. Unfortunately, you can’t apply beziers to the position or “center” keyframes. You can use beziers with just about everything else. I’ll never understand why a solution to something this simple has eluded FCP’s design team for so long – it’s incredibly frustrating.

    Splice Heist Inc.
    Toronto, ON

  • Smoked Meat

    August 23, 2005 at 2:00 am in reply to: Bizarre pixelization on output

    Luke,

    It is NOT a Deck issue. We swapped out our D-Beta deck for another, exact same model. Same issue.

    I then sent a 2-minute test (which I’d attempted to output here with dodgy results) in Apple’s uncompressed 10-bit format to an outside facility running an older G5, FCP 4.5, and AJA box (not sure which) and a SCSI array. This test was successfully laid back to D-Beta (using one of my two weekend rental decks) no less than 5 or 6 times. Stock was the exact item I’d been attempting these outputs with all weekend.

    I’m now forced to suspect the problem resides either with my 2 FW800 G-RAIDs or the Decklink Extreme card. Tomorrow I will take the drives to this outside facility and attempt to output my entire 3 hour show (in two 90 minute sections) on their system. Whatever the result, I should be able to decisively identify the culprit then.

    Will keep you updated. In the meantime, how can I get that single-frame capture sample to you? What’s your email?

    Thanks.

  • Smoked Meat

    August 22, 2005 at 2:13 pm in reply to: Bizarre pixelization on output

    I’ve got a frame for you, Luke. New to this forum – how do I post it? Or should I just email it directly to you?

  • Smoked Meat

    August 22, 2005 at 6:03 am in reply to: FCP 5 w/Extreme Edit To Tape???

    Mr. DRW,

    Yes and possibly yes. I find it extremely odd, but I’ve been on FCP 4.5 until very recently so I can’t say for sure. Another oddity is that yesterday I couldn’t drag and drop any kind of FCP sequence or clip into the Edit to Tape window. But as I say, I’m just getting up on FCP5. Others on this board are likely to be far more capable with this question that I.

    Mr. Meat

  • Smoked Meat

    August 22, 2005 at 5:36 am in reply to: FCP 5 w/Extreme Edit To Tape???

    Coincidentally, I encountered the same error message – just earlier today. Unlike you, I was working in BM 10-bit uncompressed NTSC. As a temporary workaround, I exported a Quicktime reference movie,k dropped it into Blackmagic Deck Control, and put it to tape from there,

    But I really wish FCP’s Edit to tape worked – I really need to do a few precise inserts within the completed output…

  • Thanks again Luke.

    Just to be crystal clear: you’re saying I can capture my 29.97 fps interlaced D-Beta as 23.98 fps progressive video, then reinstate the 3:2 pulldown and lay it back to D-Beta as 29.97 interlaced. And the sharpness and quality of my final layback will be precisely the same as the original D-Beta source?

  • Yes, Paul, you’re correct. And that’s the way it should be for proper cadence.

    My goal is to produce a new 29.97 master. Of the material I’m *not* deleting, I cannot afford to lose video frames in order to make the cut point look “good.” I must keep every frame within the shots I am keeping.

    Again, perhaps there’s a simple answer to this. I’m very experienced with cutting features in the 24/23.98 fps realm. But onlining and this intra-frame stuff has eluded my experience somewhat.

  • Luke,

    Thanks for your quick reply.

    Let me be clearer: the project I’ll be working on involves reducing an already-complete four-hour film down to a three-hour film. The D-Betas are sourced from film transfers done at 24fps. The sound mix for the 3 hour version already exists. In cutting the three-hour version picture, I am concerned about not being able to make smooth picture cuts between shots without chopping off ends of those shots in order to avoid a situation where, for example, the final frame of a given shot might be displayed in FCP as “OK” but in fact be composed of the final field of the ouitgoing shot and the first field of the incoming one.

    I guess the other question would be: since the material is film-sourced and the 3:2 pulldown is intact, could I simply digitize and cut at 24fps (eliminating the pulldown) and then reinstate the 3:2 on output back to D-Beta with full online quality? Quality is the primary issue here as this is not an offline situation.

    Thanks again in advance!

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy