The author was saying that Intel should be worried, not that they are in imminent danger.
Yes, the A10 Fusion is not a replacement for a Xeon, yet. The danger is if Apple starts to build bigger chips with more of these cores, unencumbered by the thermal performance needs of a handheld device.
Also… I took note that Apple used a new naming convention for the A-series chips. The iPhone 7 has the A10 “Fusion”. My immediate thought was that would allow for other strata of chips for different purposes. So maybe we’ll see an A10 “Unobtanium”.
We’re not alone in the speculation on what’s happening to the Mac. The feeling is that the long delay is a sign that some big change might be on the horizon.
One way of thinking about it is that the original 68K Mac lasted about 10 years. PPC lasted a bit longer, say, 12 years. So now we’re at the 10 year mark for Mac on X86. It’s already being talked about. Maybe we are going to see Mac move to ARM, if the history is any guidepost?
Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!
This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
My local Apple store is both in “retirement central” and a university. One day I was there, the employees were excited that Wilford Brimley had been in earlier.
Met a guy in Vegas who worked for IBM in the 1970’s. You mention Xerox and he goes off on a tirade on how stupid they were. They did make money on the patents on the laser printer, but politics on the east coast kept them from fully benefiting.
Reminds me of Avid. I heard stories back in the day that the Tewkesbury engineers were rather protective of their domain.