Forum Replies Created

Page 43 of 122
  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 10:52 pm in reply to: A special Thank You to Chris Kenny

    [TS O'Grady] “Fair enough. I’ve taken my shots and I’ll take a hit for that. But head on over to the Premiere or Avid forums and see how many posts you can find along the lines of ” Premiere/Avid sucks and anyone who defends it is an Adobe/Avid apologist!” What do you think the reaction would be over there to such a post?”

    Thats an interesting argument you make. Over the years I have seen posts where people have bashed Avid because they didn’t like the dongle, paying for support, crashing a bunch, you name it. But show me a post where someone has such a complaint, and a small clique’ of Avid-philes defend Avid carte blanche. You will see people that have solutions, similar complaints, or even those saying they have never had a lick of trouble. But I don’t think you’ll find too many that say, ‘hey, thats how Avid is, too bad, so sad, why don’t you just go buy something else you whiner’.

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 10:31 pm in reply to: FCP keep crashing when I render 99 screens.

    [Justin Murphy] “How exactly would I do it in chunks? I Have a Mac 2.8 GHz Intel core i7. Its all 1920×1800 footage.”

    What is the codec??? Maybe there is a reason you can’t do what you are trying to do.

    Do it in chunks. Do thirty screens and bake. Then add the next 30, and repeat the process until you have built up your FX.

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 9:48 pm in reply to: FCP keep crashing when I render 99 screens.

    Got more specifics?
    System, Codec, sequence settings.

    One thought is to do it in chunks if its too much for your machine. If your already locked and don’t need to make changes, split it up and bake part of it.

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 9:30 pm in reply to: A special Thank You to Chris Kenny

    [John Godwin] “I went and reviewed those links (I had read them already, when they were posted) and have seen the light.

    Okay, you win. You’re right and everyone else is wrong. FCP X sux and will never amount to anything, and Apple clearly erred in producing a new version of FCP that was not exactly what you wanted. Everyone who argues against you twists facts, lies repeatedly, is ignorant, and possibly immoral.

    You know, at some point I just give up and listen to Robert A. Heinlein:

    “Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.””

    John,
    It’s all good. Glad to see you found your Muse, because that was a well thought out and particularly effective retort. And if I might add, quite snappy and dry also.

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 8:08 pm in reply to: A Special Thanks to the Courageous Dissenters!

    [J Hussar] “I want to thank those who voiced it out, loud and intensely, about the missing features in FCPX.

    Without you Apple would have thought they had a victory in cutting out a slew of features that pros use. Without you the news-media wouldn’t have known anything was wrong. Without you, and other users around the world would have all felt alone in our frustration.

    Since we have so courageously let our voices be heard, Apple has been forced to acknowledge the apps shortcomings. In this may be the start of some real fixes and much faster than planned (if they were planned at all before we made so much noise).

    Apple has had to quickly say through Pogue’s column that restored features are coming! They have had to realize that it may be important to listen to users, not just themselves in their Cupertino echo chamber. They must consider the thoughts of who they sell their software to.

    Because of us Adobe and Avid have been motivated to lower prices for those who are seeking a life raft. Thousands of dollars saved. Hope restored.

    And for the cheerleaders, you got what you wanted anyway – why was it so necessary to shut down the dissenters? You had the abridged app you dreamed of with easy magnetic metadata – you had won your sad victory. But realize, because of the dissenters you will get even more features – you may not want them, but you may find someday you might need them. At that moment you can stop and thank us for making your work easier.

    Finally, and forgive my hyperbole but, if we only had apologists we would never make a better world, accepting the status quo is often accepting tyranny, accepting a form of slavery of thought – the dissenters bring life and freedom into discussions and the world.

    My profound thanks to the others who had the courage to step up – too many to be named. My hat is off to those who refused to drink the kool-aid of complacency.”

    Heretic! Heretic! Non-believer! *shouts from a pitchfork wielding mob*
    You are a heretic who is in congress with the beast, and ye shall be burnt at the stake to atone for your sins!

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 8:00 pm in reply to: A Special Thanks to the Courageous Dissenters!

    [Glen Hurd] “The irony.
    Apple’s famous 1984 ad was a slam against those who walk in lock-step – while covered in dust and sitting on hard benches.
    Remember the voice on the screen?

    “Today, we celebrate the first glorious rewrite of Apple’s flagship.

    We have created, for the first time in all history, an editor of pure ideology.

    Where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing timelines.

    Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any gathering of broadcast editors on Earth.

    We are one people, with one will, one resolve, one cause, one project . . . and . . . for many of you . . . one client.

    Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion . . .

    as long as I prevail!”

    Too bad the girl with the hammer isn’t wearing an Avid or Adobe logo on her shirt.
    Or it could just be blank, to show how free her mind really is.”

    Nice.
    I’m smelling another parody coming.

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 7:57 pm in reply to: A special Thank You to Chris Kenny

    [John Godwin] “Discussion is good….particularly productive in my view.”

    Let me refer you to this thread:
    https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/335/6087#6355
    Where David points out how the cherry picking of facts is done by your side to make your argument.
    That is what you are doing here, despite how many time you call yourself a pragmatist.
    I suppose next your going to start telling me how David is now unhinged, or something like that to try and defend your side.
    And you completely misconstrued what I said in the post about questioning their motives. I’m just not sure if you’re doing it deliberately, or not.
    In that thread I didn’t say they had to justify their motivations to me. I said they need to look in the mirror, and justify their motivations to themselves. I would suggest you do the same.
    There was some talk of that earlier when some of us wanted to know if some of the posters had a financial ‘dog in the fight’, in accordance with the FTC mommy blogger rules:https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/335/5570#5651
    Ron made it pretty clear that there is a huge concern over peoples motivations (https://forums.creativecow.net/readpost/335/6325) and that this is a topic that is fair game for discussion.

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 7:26 pm in reply to: A special Thank You to Chris Kenny

    [Craig Shields] “Business must be slow for you Sheriff because you sure spend a lot of time posting on a program you hate. You may need some counseling. All these “fanboys” and “apologists” sure got you panties in a bind.”

    That is truly the sign of desperation, and of someone that is loosing the debate. If I hadn’t already mentioned drowning kittens in the tub, I’m sure you would have gone there.
    I guess Steve Connor doesn’t consider that vitriol, since it’s coming from your camp. *more cricket sounds*

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 5:43 pm in reply to: A special Thank You to Chris Kenny

    [Steve Connor] “Scott, your postings are not just a discussion about the software you also use language that is also directed at people with differing opinions to yourself, language such as “Apple apologists” and “Polyannas””

    Whats your point?
    That I think that having faith in apple at this point, and saying X is a great piece of software is being Pollyanna?
    If it’s not that, then what is it?

    Also lets not forget that Chris has turned into a ‘word-burning stove’ in his effort to justify how apple handled the way FCS3 was pulled without notice.
    Are you saying that doesn’t make you an apple apologist?
    If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck…

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

  • Scott Sheriff

    July 2, 2011 at 5:18 pm in reply to: A special Thank You to Chris Kenny

    [Steve Connor] “Nice Scott, I thought this thread was missing some vitriol”

    You think that is vitriol? Vitriol is defined as cruel and harsh criticism.
    Saying people are doing high-fives over a dud, is sarcasm.
    When did we get so overly-sensitive that a little sarcasm is now redefined as vitriol?
    I was going to tell everyone to ‘man up’ a little, but if I did that I’m afraid you say I’m the kind of person drowning kittens in the bathtub or something.

    Shine on you crazy diamond…

    Scott Sheriff
    Director
    https://www.sstdigitalmedia.com

    “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.” —Red Adair

    Where were you on 6/21?

Page 43 of 122

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy