Ryan Paterson
Forum Replies Created
-
Aaaahh yes. It all makes sense now! Thanks so much for taking the time to help 🙂
-
Yep, of course. That would limit me from using other shaders on the Transparency though, no?
One of the goals of this question is to gain some insight into how the Sample Effector node works too. I don’t need an example or anything, just wondering what sort of data I would need to output from the node to get a value of 0-100 for each clone, there are so many parameters available for output I’m a little lost. I feel like if I can understand this node I’ll be using it all the time.
-
Sweet good tip. i would like to do it on the transparency channel however so that I can take advantage of the other settings like refraction etc. Any ideas on that?
-
Right. That makes sense. So is After Effects ppi independent then? I assumed it was at 72ppi but then I read in the article above that video really has no ppi at all, so I’m guessing that all ppi information would just be a result of the output module’s settings?
For example if I was to export a Photoshop file it would automatically do it at 72, just because it has to output SOMETHING for Photoshop to read?
-
Good call! Thank you
-
Cool, now what if I want to break up say, a cube, but only have the surface divided into new polygons without creating extra geometry, will Thrausi do that?
-
Don’t feel bad, I Just did the same thing.
-
Yup!! I actually just figured that out last night, but now it’s here for the world to see. Thanks man!
-
I don’t think you are understanding me correctly, thanks though. I am aware of how to do it with a cloner as stated in the first post, wanted to do it with an emitter specifically. Upon reflection it’s a weird request. I appreciate you taking the time to help out!
-
Ya, no I know all of that. I just don’t want to see the particles emitting, wondering if there’s a way to run the particles, and then save them in their completed state. I don’t think there is though 🙁