Forum Replies Created

Page 18 of 171
  • [Neil Sadwelkar] “So, Compressor-made simple Blu-ray will do for the moment, thank you. “

    Good insights Neil. The implementation in Compressor/FCP for Blu-ray is perfect for me. I’ll even use it now when I’m created DVDs. As I’ve mentioned 95% of the discs I burn are very simple. I believe you can even set up chapter points in it. That’s great for most editors!

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 25, 2009 at 2:47 pm in reply to: Why No DVD Studio Pro Upgrade: My Take

    [Michael Sacci] “I will put on my prediction hat. If Apple does get into the BluRay making business they will buy DoStudio and make it their own.”

    I completely agree. That matches the Apple model. It’s a great product and it’s the right size company. If DoStudio wanted to really get Apples attention, then they should start programing it for Mac. That could be the best business move they could make.

    Having visited with the Final Touch guys at their headquarters, I can tell you that getting bought by Apple seemed to be their business plan. That was their goal. It worked too!

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 24, 2009 at 7:54 pm in reply to: Some overlooked FCP7 Improvements

    Andrew, you’ve got a good list there. Ever consider trying to get hired as a consultant by Apple:)

    As you’ve pointed out, there are several ways that Apple could innovate with the interface. And seeing your perspective, I think your criticism is valid.

    I think I’ve been caught up in what has appeared to me as a bunch of users that have been criticizing FCS3 based on what they hoped Apple would do. Much of what I’ve heard has seemed to be more about whinnying and moaning instead of people looking deep into the upgrade to see what’s really there and how they can use the tool. Many of those people sound like Apple owes them something, like a free Blu-Ray authoring application.

    Anyways, I’m very excited about FCS3 and looking forward to a FCS4 someday.

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 24, 2009 at 7:31 pm in reply to: Is FCS3 worth $300 to upgrade?

    [Arnie Schlissel] “What’s wrong with compressed formats? HDCam SR and D5 are compressed. “

    To add to that ProRes 4×4 is a superior format to those two. 12-bit with option of alpha channel. A ProRes 4×4 copy on a drive is a higher standard than a HDCAM SR tape. It’s really going to give the industry a shake up (at least on an independent level).

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 24, 2009 at 3:55 pm in reply to: FCS3: The REAL Game Changer is….

    [Damian O’Neill] “This new codec alone sounds like a good reason to bring out a new version of FCP. “

    The new codecs alone are worth at least $1000! I would have paid much more. $300 is a steal!!!

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 24, 2009 at 3:53 pm in reply to: FCP Workflow Conundrum

    I think it’s cool that SD ProRes Proxy is like 1.25MB/sec at 480/24P. 4GB/hour. That will make a lot of people happy.

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 24, 2009 at 3:47 pm in reply to: Some overlooked FCP7 Improvements

    [Andrew Keil] “Firstly, lack of a search bar in the browser is unforgivable in my opinion.”

    That would be very cool. Have you ever told Apple? Use the feedback menu item and suggest it.

    [Andrew Keil] “Why is the text generator from motion not integrated into FCP to replace the text tool?”

    Text in FCP could definitely be improved.

    [Andrew Keil] “Whether you think Blu-Ray is here to stay or not is irrelevant.”

    Check out my post on this. I still think Apple will do something more extensive with Blu-Ray authoring, but they obviously have their reasons. Whether you need it or not, Apple is making business decisions. Notice that no Mac comes with a Blu-Ray option yet. There is a larger issue at hand. They obviously know it’s important to the client base, that’s why there is the basic authoring in Compressor/FCP now.

    [Andrew Keil] “You can already screen share in iChat, so is this really a banner update? “

    Performance on full screen sharing is poor for video. This really is a banner update that will really allow my facility to stand out from others.

    [Andrew Keil] “The App has barely changed since they bought FInal Touch and re-named it. “

    Being an original Final Touch user, the app became stable once Apple go it. That was a great step!

    [Andrew Keil] “but was it too much to ask to bring it in line with the rest of the pro-apps?”

    Not trying to be rude, but what would this buy you? Would you be a better colorist if the Color interface would be more like the DVD Studio Pro interface? At best, it would probably save a few seconds there and there because of more consistent file/menu layout. I think it would be nice too if things felt more cohesive, but would it change the way I work? The apps are still quite powerful and they continue to improve.

    [Andrew Keil] “For two versions now they have treaded water when they could be trailblazing.”

    The more I get into learning about the update, this falls more into the line of trailblazing than treading water. I do see that you’re disappointed though. I think this has more to do with how Apple has marketed and hyped FCP upgrades in the past. I think that it has set an expectation on when upgrades should come and how big or revolutionary they should be. Now that they’re changing their approach, it’s understandable that they’re not meeting so many people’s expectation on what the upgrade “should be”.

    Heck, for $300, this upgrade is a steal and a no-brainer!

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 24, 2009 at 3:33 pm in reply to: Some overlooked FCP7 Improvements

    Glad you agree Zaner!

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 24, 2009 at 3:25 pm in reply to: New Workflow AVCHD for FCP7

    Looks like you skipped over the part where I suggested converting it to ProRes Proxy. If your files are 24P then it’s only 4 MB/sec. That’s only 16GB/hour.

    Yes, it’s bigger than editing native AVCHD files, but it’s much better than the previous alternatives of ProRes or AIC. Plus, these files will be much more edit friendly than if FCP could edit AVCHD natively.

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

  • Russell Lasson

    July 24, 2009 at 1:56 pm in reply to: Some overlooked FCP7 Improvements

    The more I start digging into the details, the more I realize how good of an upgrade this really is. I’ll start compiling a list of features that I’ll quickly learn that I never could have lived without as soon as I can get it installed.

    -Russ

    Russell Lasson
    Colorist/Digital Cinema Specialist
    Color Mill
    Salt Lake City, UT
    http://www.colormill.net

Page 18 of 171

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy