Forum Replies Created

Page 7 of 8
  • Rosh Kadri

    January 17, 2008 at 2:18 pm in reply to: Mixer to Cam enough

    alright, i’ll just use the film setting on the 702t, which is 24bit 48khz. and ty is right, its not just he equipment, its also the person operating it. thanks everyone

  • Rosh Kadri

    January 17, 2008 at 2:23 am in reply to: Mixer to Cam enough

    i’m going double system not so much for the 96khz, but for the 24bit, the extra dynamic range and more room to apply effects and processing, i tested a file going into camera with 302, sounds good, but with 302 into 702T, OH MY! clean, crisp, so little noise, i thought the machine was off.

    the headroom is where it excels. i also like the multipurpose of the recorder for SFX,ambience, music, foley etc. and not all camera operators like to be tithered either.

  • Rosh Kadri

    January 16, 2008 at 4:37 am in reply to: Mixer to Cam enough

    thanks ty, i decided to stick to double system and use the 702t,

    as you know that extra dynamic range and more room to play with is a bonus. 24bit, 96khz it is, with proper mic placement etc. of course

    thanks again.

  • Rosh Kadri

    January 15, 2008 at 11:26 pm in reply to: Mixer to Cam enough

    thanks ty, nice to meet you. so iam wondering if audio is well recorded in 16bit in camera (hvx200) for dialogue, and then in post is converted to 32bit float, i know this doesnt improve quality buy my understanding is the rounding is better?

  • i used avid and premiere pro, then thought to myself, what the heck am i doing, after using vegas for two hours i fell in love.
    Its the simplest, most straight forward program on the market today. Not only is it easy to learn, but its features are just as good as the “industry standards”. In fact, vegas has the best
    audio capabilities than avid and fcp which cost more and have a deeper learning curve.

    And by the way, photoshop has more whistles and buttons than all the NLE’S put together.

    you cant compare photoshop (an image, animation program) to vegas (An NLE). Apples and oranges.

  • Rosh Kadri

    December 8, 2007 at 10:15 pm in reply to: Vegas Or Protools

    wow, what a wealth of info. Thanks everyone, thank you spot.
    You made me realize what marketing can do to a person using the tools, i decided to spend more time discovering the power of vegas and sound forge and forgetting those bulls%$#@rs. I’m looking to doing some high end mixes in vegas and you’ve been an
    inspiration spot. thank you

  • Rosh Kadri

    December 8, 2007 at 4:21 pm in reply to: Vegas for Final mixes

    thanks spot, as to #1, i meant say you have a project set at 24bit, 48khz now you import an audio file from CD, others will give you an option to convert to the project rate or keep the original rate, say you pick original rate, this as you know will be pitched up. why not vegas?

  • Rosh Kadri

    December 8, 2007 at 4:15 pm in reply to: Vegas Or Protools

    Thanks Spot, very inspiring. I wonder why sony wouldnt list these credits under their “showcase” on the sony creative software site. I believe it would give vegas more sales and credibility.

  • Rosh Kadri

    November 2, 2007 at 1:30 am in reply to: using sony Vegas to edit a feature

    no OMF support yet, and i dont believe the edl is a standard cmx format.

    you can use AAF or use something like cui bono soft edl convert which can go from .VEG to OMF etc.

    good luck

  • Rosh Kadri

    September 28, 2007 at 2:32 am in reply to: HVX for theatrical films

    ok thanks, 1080 24pa it is for the next feature

Page 7 of 8

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy