Forum Replies Created

Page 32 of 51
  • Ronny Courtens

    September 26, 2013 at 9:23 pm in reply to: Idea for a new feature in FCPX

    It’s limited to a total number of 200 undo’s it can save, but yes they go beyond closing the program.

    – Ronny

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 26, 2013 at 8:20 pm in reply to: Live tomorrow night…

    I had no problem whatsoever with the technical side of the webcast. I’m a hopeless perfectionist myself but if the message is interesting I, and I think most people, can be extremely forgiving about the rest. Of course you can always do better but technically this went very, very well for a first live show and I must say in all honesty that you did a real good job presenting it.

    On another forum I frequent real-life workflow breakdowns and videos of FCPX in action are the most watched topics. I am a major participant on two very popular FCP-centric forums. If you can incorporate live demos of FCPX at work in your webcasts I will not hesitate inviting everyone there to watch them.

    – Ronny

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 26, 2013 at 4:52 pm in reply to: Live tomorrow night…

    I have appreciated the webcast and I don’t regret getting up at 4 a.m. to watch it. It was indeed fun interacting with Brad and some people I know from the forums while watching the presentation.

    If I may Bill, I would like to suggest one thing for the webcast: when you demoed the multicam or when you talked about the keyer all we saw was the FCPX timeline for the multicam or a green screen clip in the browser for the keyer, but we did not see the multicam or the keyer at work. As both these features are among the many things where FCPX really excels it would have been better to see them in action.

    I think it is your intention to go deeper into features in coming shows, and when you do this please show FCPX in action because actually showing how easy and yet deeply things can be done in FCPX is what will convince even more people to start using it seriously. It also will attract more viewers to your webcast when people hear they really can see FCPX at work instead of just getting information about what it can do.

    Just my 2 eurocents, and looking forward to the next webcast.

    – Ronny

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 26, 2013 at 3:04 pm in reply to: Garbage mask in FCPX

    I agree on Slice-X/Mocha, it’s truly amazing. At this time there is no direct link between Motion and FCPX except for creating effect, title and generator templates. But this should come very, very soon now.

    – Ronny

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 26, 2013 at 12:10 pm in reply to: Garbage mask in FCPX

    Hi Morten,

    This is a free animatable garbage matte for FCPX. It comes in 3 versions (4-point, 8-point, 16-point). I haven’t used it yet but watching the video you may see if this is what you are looking for:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_l2K6rXwGw

    The download link is in the text under the video

    – Ronny

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 26, 2013 at 7:20 am in reply to: Option-click for keyframe doesn’t work

    Hi Loren,

    I don’t think you can turn this off or on. Does the keyboard shortcut to add an audio keyframe (Option+K) work?

    – Ronny

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 26, 2013 at 7:08 am in reply to: Idea for a new feature in FCPX

    Hi Sascha,

    Seeing how Logic Pro X is dealing with versions (“alternatives”) and it has an undo feature that goes beyond closing of the application, I think there’s a big chance your wish will come true.

    – Ronny

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 26, 2013 at 3:58 am in reply to: Live tomorrow night…

    Just watched the show and I liked it. Thank you, Bill.

    – Ronny

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 25, 2013 at 9:13 pm in reply to: Bug with dissapearing markers on the primary storyline

    I agree with Charlie.

    You must understand that gaps are NOT clips and you should not work with gaps like you work with clips. Gaps are only useful when they are placed between clips. Sliced-up gaps (without any clips between them) don’t have any use and they will always be joined by FCPX whenever it can. So you never should put markers on top of a sliced-up gap.

    If you want to edit without using the Primary Storyline but you still want to put markers on it, just put a slug generator or an adjustment layer in the Primary. This will act as a regular clip to which your secondaries and CCs are attached and above which you can add markers.

    – Ronny

  • Ronny Courtens

    September 25, 2013 at 5:35 pm in reply to: More audio tracks being deleted than I select

    That is indeed a very plausible explanation.

    – Ronny

Page 32 of 51

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy