Robin S. kurz
Forum Replies Created
-
[Robin S. Kurz] “But even so, there are 241 *listed* features”
Oh, and just a minor side-note as far as the “gotcha!” point is concerned…
[Dennis Radeke] “Just counting from CC […] I can casually add up about 200 items that don’t include all of the small features”
An interesting claim, since I’m curious to know how that works out. Seeing that I can only conjure up 187 bullet-points i.e. new features since CC from that page. Casually or not. And yes, that’s including several points I think anyone would consider small features.
So if I’m to take that as the ultimate demonstration for superior quality/usability or whatever else between two apps… oops. Then I guess in this case X is roughly 30% better! 😀
But, I fortunately prefer to judge a tool by its practical merits in the context of my personal needs, not by the power of the PR-machine behind it or even by what the most belligerent ones screaming the loudest say is THE thing to use. So even switching the (utterly meaningless) numbers and multiplying them wouldn’t change squat for me. I guess I’m just weird that way.
🙂
-
Sorry if I’m not about to go through all of the 241 LISTED features just to figure out which others aren’t in fact listed, just to satisfy the “Mine is bigger than yours” fraction. I’m pretty sure everyone actually using X on a daily basis has found a plethora of them on their own. Certainly countless amounts along the magnitude of “Added back button”.
But then I don’t measure software quality or usability by a feature list i.e. PR-savyness either way. So sorry for not keeping score.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
[Steve Connor] “You can judge for yourselves here”
And again, not nearly all new features etc. are listed. Not even close.
But even so, there are 241 LISTED features, yes.
-
[Dennis Radeke] “I can casually add up about 200 items”
Yes, well, if Apple were to pad their lists with such things as “Back button added”, “Preference to display the end of sequence indicator”, “Search Bins”, every little OpenCL optimization etc. etc., I’m fairly sure their lists would be considerably longer also, yes. And never mind that version 10.1 alone featured hundreds of new features… after the hundreds before that. Most definitely ones of that magnitude. Only not every last gory detail is listed somewhere, since I guess Apple’s not into the “Mine is bigger than yours” game?
[Dennis Radeke] “Broadcast output, tape lay back and a source monitor are all ones that come to mind.”
Of course they are. Whereby we’ll just ignore that those are all features that were added within the first six months of its development cycle. 😀 So maybe listing those points of all things is disingenuous if not simply gratuitous at best? I’d say you’re rather late to that game… so by about 3.5 years. 😉
And yeah, everything ever added was only to get it up to speed with 7. Since, as we all know, X has absolutely nothing unique to show for in terms of features in comparison. Funny how I keep forgetting that. Weird. Almost as if it were a completely fallacious, nonsensical argument.
🙂
-
I’m told they’re unable to reproduce and would need screenshots of e.g. the window with the slider settings to move forward. Basically any and all details of all the settings used that you can provide via screenshots.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
[Michael Gissing] “I would dearly like to buy a liftime’s garbage collection but the bloody council insist I pay quarterly subscriptions called rates for such services.”
An obvious non sequitur.
[Andy Field] “The continuing improvements on CC saves me time and makes me money.”
Huh? So how exactly do “continuing improvements” not apply to any and every other NLE on the market… only in most cases WITHOUT the monthly expense?? Apparently you missed the fact that the software I paid for ONCE over four years ago has had over FIFTEEN updates for naught ever since? Never mind that that figures out to roughly six bucks a month (and getting less by the day).
No idea why you appear to want to sell us on the idea that PPro/Adobe are somehow following some brilliantly unique master plan that everyone else is missing out on. But then I guess they are, just that there a lot of people that in fact want no part of it. To each his own. Just try not to justify your own decision by suggesting everyone else is a clueless doofus because they made a different choice and lack your superior “pro” vision and business sense. That truly does not help your position the least bit.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
[Andy Field] “if you can’t afford the 30 40 or 50 a month for that, then you need to find another business……”
And if you think it’s somehow a matter of “being able to afford“… oh well.
So I guess you never have to upgrade your hardware, being an Adobe user and all.
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
[Ronny Courtens] “If the little UI glitch is inside the FCP X code, Apple will certainly not release an update to FCP X just for this,”
Agreed. Moving the update cycle around for a simple, non-detrimental and mere cosmetic issue would be rather extreme and unnecessarily knee-jerk imho. The only issues I know of that are left, concern specialty 3rd party audio hardware and/or plugins. But in general, not in the context of FCPX.
[Mitch Ives] “Maybe the upcoming 10.11.2?”
No. At least not with the current beta.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
Then I guess I’ll have to take your word for it and stand corrected. 🙂
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich! -
[Walter Soyka] “No two independent codec implementations are likely to produce exactly the same bitstream output”
I was referring to one and the same source of course. I’m aware that there are different DV implementations, yes.
– RK
____________________________________________________
Deutsch? Hier gibt es ein umfassendes FCP X Training für dich!